[Campaigns-l] Campaigns Wikia abuse' concerns?

[Ed Rodgers]

this can also lead to the same problems i associate with legislature,
where wiki articles get so large that some misinformation will 'slip
through the cracks' .. where something looks good as a whole, but then
you slip in the 'riders' that turn the gold back into lead.

so therefore there needs to be a large collaboration of involved
persons outside the actual political arena to serve as the balance and
moderation of presented information.

this is our jobs, to get those we know involved as well to whatever
extent they are willing.  the campaign for campaign moderation.

On 7/6/06, Lord Voldemort <lordbishopvoldemort at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/6/06, Mark Slater <mark.slater at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess if push comes to shove and it's quite obvious that such
> > editing is happening, you have choices, from offering a sharp-worded
> > "if you are employed by a politician or an affiliated association,
> > please read this nasty legalese disclaimer before editing", all the
> > way to "if you are employed by a politican, you are barred from
> > editing this wiki and if we find out that you're doing it anyway,
> > we'll sue you!".
> >
> > Though I doubt neither of those possibilities are what Jim Wales had in mind...
>
> Whoa, definitely not.  As Kat explicitly states that people working
> within a candidate's campaign should be involved.  Did someone miss
> that part on the Draft policies page?  ;-)  We just have to be
> vigilant and revert any egregious mistakes they may implement on their
> opponent's pages.  And besides, don't you think it would look bad if
> they were caught acting as saboteurs on their opponent's pages? :-)
> --LV
> _______________________________________________
> Campaigns-l mailing list
> Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
>