[Campaigns-l] prurient garbage

[Stephen Abbott]

I don't believe the level and tenor of discourse associated with both of the
names mentioned here, and others mentioned earlier, are indicative of the
"new politics" and intillegent tone Jimbo was aiming for here.

Let's keep politicians' sex lives out of this wikia. Or not. Whatever.
Apparently, there are no limits, rules or guidelines, so "anything goes."

We'll see how that works out. I suspect, however, we'll end up with exactly
what we see on the partisan blogs.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathleen de la Peña McCook" <kmccook at tampabay.rr.com>
To: <neoclassical at mail.com>; <campaigns-l at wikia.com>;
<campaigns-l-bounces at wikia.com>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 7:52 AM
Subject: [Campaigns-l] prurient garbage


> I don't see how one can determine that a central component of
> humanity--sexuality--is prurient garbage. Clinton's impeachment was
> largely focused on his sexuality; Robert Livingstone could not serve
> as Speaker because of his sexuality; etc. etc.
>
>
> On 9 Jul 2006 at 23:21, neoclassical at mail.com wrote:
>
> >
> > > Frankly, I don't see the need for ANY of this purient garbage here.
> >
> > "I don't see" is not a logical argument.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Campaigns-l mailing list
> Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
>