[Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy COGITO ERGO SUM

[Chad Lupkes]

Rob,

What is your username on Campaigns.wikia?  I'd like to see what
content contributions have been jumped on by the community.

Chad

On 11/13/06, CH Rob J King <kuriosiesuschristos at abidinglifephoenix.com> wrote:
> neo-classical . . . THANK YOU!  As much as the post-modern literary critics
> (Stanley Fish) and philosophers
>
>
>
>
>
> (Wittgenstein
> 0) like to say that "texts" do not exist as such in the free-floating,
> meandering morass called post-modern thought, since language itself exists
> (cogito ergo sum), then texts must also exist.  Therefore, I applaud your
> conviction that Ingmar et al should treat writing as a neutral endeavor or
> to be openly polemical.  The problem with the encyclopaedic genre (a
> critique I draw from moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre's Gifford Lectures
> entitled Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry), in that a form of
> "neutrality" is posited, but in actuality, the neutrality is often a highly
> politicized, albeit cloak & dagger form of will-to-power . . . I will not
> knock Wikipedia itself because often it is quite good.  I will state however
> that Wik-campaigns is a on-line liberal enterprise that tries to claim
> objectivity, but in fact is highly political of a peculiar non-thinking,
> knee-jerk sort.  I hold liberal views (immigration, pollution control,
> minimum wages, etc), but the second I defend the life of babies who are
> being hacked to bits by abortion "doctors" (Nazi eugenists in drag!), the
> whole Wik-campaigns jumps on me.
>
> Thank you for defending textual objectivity . . . If only the 1972 Supreme
> Court could have been so intelligent . . . (i.e. the supposed constitutional
> "right" to kill babies in utero was not even in the "text," but in the
> "penumbra" of the text . . . in other words, NOT ACTUALLY THERE!!!  So,
> post-modern tought can and does kill . . .)
>
> CON CHRISTO MI SALVADOR, Rob J King (Opus Dei wannabe :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CH Rob J. King, M.Div., Th.M., Ph.D. (ABD*)
>
>
> Chaplain, AR-MEDCOM
>
>
> Professor of Bible and Christian Ministry Grand Canyon University-Online
> Abiding Life Christian Ministries--Phoenix & Tampa Bay
> Ministry Home Page:
> http://abidinglifephoenix.com/default.aspx
>
>
> Ministry E-Mail: kuriosiesuschristos at abidinglifephoenix.com
>
>
>
>
> "I will bless those who bless you . . . and in you all the families of the
> earth shall be blessed."  --Genesis 12:3
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> > From: neoclassical at mail.com
> > To: campaigns-l at wikia.com
> > Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:01:18 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy
> >
> >
> > > How do you think we could structure Ingmar's freedom ideas?
> >
> > I think you should start from a philosophically neutral position.
> >
> > I think you should view Wikipedian editors as guardians of text, not
> creators of it.
> >
> > I think you should get experts to create that text.
> >
> > Furthermore, I think you should use philosophical and not "political"
> classifications to avoid redundancy.
> >
> > Anything else will have inherent bias (as much of Wikipedia does today).
> >
> > --
> >
> > Search for products and services at:
> > http://search.mail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Campaigns-l mailing list
> > Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Campaigns-l mailing list
> Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
>
>
>