[Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy COGITO ERGO SUM

[CH Rob J King]

Chad, My original thread is extremely cordial.  It can be found at . . . http://www.mail-archive.com/campaigns-l@wikia.com/msg00611.html
Luis immediately jumped all over this response.  This is the most vitriolic of the responses http://www.mail-archive.com/campaigns-l@wikia.com/msg00622.html (prior & follow-up responses can also be located off of this page).
Blessings, Rob J King 





CH Rob J. King, M.Div., Th.M., Ph.D. (ABD*)

Chaplain, AR-MEDCOM

Professor of Bible and Christian Ministry Grand Canyon University-Online  Abiding Life Christian Ministries--Phoenix & Tampa BayMinistry Home Page: http://abidinglifephoenix.com/default.aspx

Ministry E-Mail: kuriosiesuschristos at abidinglifephoenix.com



"I will bless those who bless you . . . and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed."  --Genesis 12:3 

> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:53:56 -0800> From: chadlupkes at gmail.com> To: campaigns-l at wikia.com> Subject: Re: [Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy COGITO ERGO SUM> > Rob,> > What is your username on Campaigns.wikia? I'd like to see what> content contributions have been jumped on by the community.> > Chad> > On 11/13/06, CH Rob J King <kuriosiesuschristos at abidinglifephoenix.com> wrote:> > neo-classical . . . THANK YOU! As much as the post-modern literary critics> > (Stanley Fish) and philosophers> >> >> >> >> >> > (Wittgenstein> > 0) like to say that "texts" do not exist as such in the free-floating,> > meandering morass called post-modern thought, since language itself exists> > (cogito ergo sum), then texts must also exist. Therefore, I applaud your> > conviction that Ingmar et al should treat writing as a neutral endeavor or> > to be openly polemical. The problem with the encyclopaedic genre (a> > critique I draw from moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre's Gifford Lectures> > entitled Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry), in that a form of> > "neutrality" is posited, but in actuality, the neutrality is often a highly> > politicized, albeit cloak & dagger form of will-to-power . . . I will not> > knock Wikipedia itself because often it is quite good. I will state however> > that Wik-campaigns is a on-line liberal enterprise that tries to claim> > objectivity, but in fact is highly political of a peculiar non-thinking,> > knee-jerk sort. I hold liberal views (immigration, pollution control,> > minimum wages, etc), but the second I defend the life of babies who are> > being hacked to bits by abortion "doctors" (Nazi eugenists in drag!), the> > whole Wik-campaigns jumps on me.> >> > Thank you for defending textual objectivity . . . If only the 1972 Supreme> > Court could have been so intelligent . . . (i.e. the supposed constitutional> > "right" to kill babies in utero was not even in the "text," but in the> > "penumbra" of the text . . . in other words, NOT ACTUALLY THERE!!! So,> > post-modern tought can and does kill . . .)> >> > CON CHRISTO MI SALVADOR, Rob J King (Opus Dei wannabe :-)> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > CH Rob J. King, M.Div., Th.M., Ph.D. (ABD*)> >> >> > Chaplain, AR-MEDCOM> >> >> > Professor of Bible and Christian Ministry Grand Canyon University-Online> > Abiding Life Christian Ministries--Phoenix & Tampa Bay> > Ministry Home Page:> > http://abidinglifephoenix.com/default.aspx> >> >> > Ministry E-Mail: kuriosiesuschristos at abidinglifephoenix.com> >> >> >> >> > "I will bless those who bless you . . . and in you all the families of the> > earth shall be blessed." --Genesis 12:3> >> >> >> >> > ________________________________> > > From: neoclassical at mail.com> > > To: campaigns-l at wikia.com> > > Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:01:18 -0500> > > Subject: Re: [Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy> > >> > >> > > > How do you think we could structure Ingmar's freedom ideas?> > >> > > I think you should start from a philosophically neutral position.> > >> > > I think you should view Wikipedian editors as guardians of text, not> > creators of it.> > >> > > I think you should get experts to create that text.> > >> > > Furthermore, I think you should use philosophical and not "political"> > classifications to avoid redundancy.> > >> > > Anything else will have inherent bias (as much of Wikipedia does today).> > >> > > --> > >> > > Search for products and services at:> > > http://search.mail.com> > >> > > _______________________________________________> > > Campaigns-l mailing list> > > Campaigns-l at wikia.com> > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l> >> > _______________________________________________> > Campaigns-l mailing list> > Campaigns-l at wikia.com> > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l> >> >> >> _______________________________________________> Campaigns-l mailing list> Campaigns-l at wikia.com> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/campaigns-l/attachments/20061113/0d9929d0/attachment.html