[Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy

[CH Rob J King]

Chad, Thank you for this post!  Yes, like it or not, WE ARE THE NEW POLITICIANS of AMERICA . . . Karl Rove got his start as an 18 year old in young Republicans, and teamed up with Morton Blackwell at the Leadership Institute and so now has been in the White House as "Bush's Brain" for the past 6 years . . . Similarly, like it or not, both party movers & shakers are having to go the direction of internet-based technology.  Blessings in Jesus, Rob J King (Theo-crat ;-)





CH Rob J. King, M.Div., Th.M., Ph.D. (ABD*)

Chaplain, AR-MEDCOM

Professor of Bible and Christian Ministry Grand Canyon University-Online  Abiding Life Christian Ministries--Phoenix & Tampa BayMinistry Home Page: http://abidinglifephoenix.com/default.aspx

Ministry E-Mail: kuriosiesuschristos at abidinglifephoenix.com



"I will bless those who bless you . . . and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed."  --Genesis 12:3 

> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:11:29 -0800> From: chadlupkes at gmail.com> To: campaigns-l at wikia.com> Subject: Re: [Campaigns-l] Enemies of Democracy> > However, if we wait for 'experts' to create our content, we will be> waiting forever. Wikipedia may not be perfect, but the more it grows,> the more it attracts those experts who can correct and maintain the> accuracy of the content. I think we are walking the same path. I> consider us all 'experts' in our local campaigns and about the issues> we care about. If we're wrong, let others come and correct us.> > Please define 'philosophically neutral' in the context of a political> discussion, especially given the global nature of our website. The> United States alone is as polarized along partisan lines as much as we> have ever been since the Civil War. I'm not neutral in what I post,> nor can I expect anyone else to be. But what I try to be, and expect> others to be in turn, is fair to other viewpoints.> > Political discussions are biased by their very nature. Each> individual has a bias in some direction or another. We're not trying> to discourage that bias, we're trying to allow us all to learn from> one another and come to terms with our collective diversity.> > Chad> > On 11/12/06, neoclassical at mail.com <neoclassical at mail.com> wrote:> >> > > How do you think we could structure Ingmar's freedom ideas?> >> > I think you should start from a philosophically neutral position.> >> > I think you should view Wikipedian editors as guardians of text, not creators of it.> >> > I think you should get experts to create that text.> >> > Furthermore, I think you should use philosophical and not "political" classifications to avoid redundancy.> >> > Anything else will have inherent bias (as much of Wikipedia does today).> >> > --> >> > Search for products and services at:> > http://search.mail.com> >> > _______________________________________________> > Campaigns-l mailing list> > Campaigns-l at wikia.com> > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l> >> _______________________________________________> Campaigns-l mailing list> Campaigns-l at wikia.com> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/campaigns-l/attachments/20061113/0dd21fa1/attachment.html