[Campaigns-l] Too many votes?

[Chad Lupkes]

Nós estamos discutindo a quantidade de tempo feita exame acima por
discussões da política em vez realmente de afixar o índice
significativo. É você ativo em campanhas?

http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr

Chad

On 10/16/06, Caroline Mendes de Oliveira <krolmendes_bh at yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Não me mande mais essas mensagens pois eu não sei inglês, não entendo nada
> do que disse.
>
> Brian Reilly <allthecoolnameshavegone at gmail.com> escreveu:
> There shouldn't be lasting decisions on policy in a site this small. And
> voting is not the only way to make a decision. I'm concerned we are goign to
> be stuck with policies that came through because of a couple of votes, and
> will be hard to get rid of when they become obsolete.
>
> On 10/11/06, Chad Lupkes <chadlupkes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Without a doubt.  It's taking up way too much time, and it's driving
> > people away.
> >
> > So, which of us on this list or of the people active on the wiki site
> > shall impose our view of how things should be run on everyone else?
> > Which of us shall be the boss over all content decisions?  I'm not
> > willing to do that.  I'm not willing to be "the boss".  And I would
> > hope that none of us want to.
> >
> > What I'm trying to say is that this is how groups organize themselves.
> > We make decisions about rules of conduct, we discuss them and debate
> > them, and then we vote on those decisions.  We have not established a
> > list of people who can present ideas, we've opened it up to everyone.
> > So we've had a lot of ideas.
> >
> > Why this is preventing us from building the site in other ways, I
> > don't know.  I'm doing everything I have time to do.  I think that's a
> > question of promotion more than anything else.
> >
> > Chad
> >
> > On 10/11/06, Brian Reilly
> <allthecoolnameshavegone at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > There seems to be a lot of voting on policies on Campaigns Wikia at the
> > > moment. I have taken part in them all, but now I am wondering if it's
> such a
> > > good idea.
> > >
> > > First of all, this is still a small group. Around 7 people vote on a
> > > subject. Is counting "yes" or "no" votes the best way to resolve
> disputes?
> > > Surely with the numbers getting involved in policy debates, more
> dialogue is
> > > a better idea.
> > >
> > > Secondly, these are early days. Do we want policies which have been
> decided
> > > on by a tiny group of people (sometimes 2 or 3 votes approving of a
> policy
> > > can be all it takes to get it passed) to direct this community? Yes,
> they
> > > can be changed later (more voting!) but do we need to be setting them
> quite
> > > yet?
> > >
> > > Mopst people on this list aren't participating in these votes, why? Is
> it
> > > because you feel much the same way as I do? Are there too many votes on
> the
> > > wiki at the moment?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Campaigns-l mailing list
> > > Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Campaigns-l mailing list
> > Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Campaigns-l mailing list
> Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> O Yahoo! está de cara nova. Venha conferir!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Campaigns-l mailing list
> Campaigns-l at wikia.com
> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
>
>
>