[Campaigns-l] political discussion list policy?

[Jonathan Trenn]

That's not exactly an apology for calling the Catholic Church a lie, but I'll have to head over to Chad's blog to continue the conversation.  That's of course after I report Luis to the Pope.  ; )
  
Chad Lupkes <chadlupkes at gmail.com> wrote:
  Let me put something else on the table. This mailing list right now
has around 800 people. Given that we are trying to create a space
where everyone is equal, and all views are valued, what would happen
if all 800 people jumped at certain words within any given post and
chimed in? We would all get hundreds or thousands of emails that we
could not begin to deal with or answer.

Answering your email with mine was a mistake. It's not a question of
"feeding trolls" as some have already suggested to me. It's a
question of what place specific topics and discussion threads have in
the big picture of participatory politics. We each have our forums,
and we all have our "flocks". Let's use this list to figure out how
to work together. The wiki is where debates need to happen. This
list needs to answer the question "how", not "what".

Chad

On 10/19/06, CH Rob J King wrote:
>
>
> Luis, Okay . . . I really do not know how to respond. I get these Wiki
> Campaign e-mails on a daily basis, most of which do not pertain to me, even
> while working formally with a Presidential Exploratory Committee (Mark
> Klein, MD), but when I saw "common ground" as a theme, I chimed in, but
> wished to challenge the de facto exclusion of abortion as a political issue.
>
> Blessings,
>
> Rob J. King
>
>
_______________________________________________
Campaigns-l mailing list
Campaigns-l at wikia.com
http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l


 		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/campaigns-l/attachments/20061019/1bf28900/attachment.html