Não me mande mais essas mensagens pois eu não sei inglês, não entendo nada do que disse.<BR><BR><B><I>Brian Reilly <allthecoolnameshavegone@gmail.com></I></B> escreveu: <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">There shouldn't be lasting decisions on policy in a site this small. And voting is not the only way to make a decision. I'm concerned we are goign to be stuck with policies that came through because of a couple of votes, and will be hard to get rid of when they become obsolete. <BR><BR> <DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 10/11/06, <B class=gmail_sendername>Chad Lupkes</B> <<A href="mailto:chadlupkes@gmail.com">chadlupkes@gmail.com</A>> wrote:</SPAN> <BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Without a doubt. It's taking up way too much time, and it's driving<BR>people away.<BR><BR>So, which of us on this list or of
the people active on the wiki site <BR>shall impose our view of how things should be run on everyone else?<BR>Which of us shall be the boss over all content decisions? I'm not<BR>willing to do that. I'm not willing to be "the boss". And I would <BR>hope that none of us want to.<BR><BR>What I'm trying to say is that this is how groups organize themselves.<BR>We make decisions about rules of conduct, we discuss them and debate<BR>them, and then we vote on those decisions. We have not established a <BR>list of people who can present ideas, we've opened it up to everyone.<BR>So we've had a lot of ideas.<BR><BR>Why this is preventing us from building the site in other ways, I<BR>don't know. I'm doing everything I have time to do. I think that's a <BR>question of promotion more than anything else.<BR><BR>Chad<BR><BR>On 10/11/06, Brian Reilly <<A
href="mailto:allthecoolnameshavegone@gmail.com">allthecoolnameshavegone@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> There seems to be a lot of voting on policies on Campaigns Wikia at the <BR>> moment. I have taken part in them all, but now I am wondering if it's such a<BR>> good idea.<BR>><BR>> First of all, this is still a small group. Around 7 people vote on a<BR>> subject. Is counting "yes" or "no" votes the best way to resolve disputes? <BR>> Surely with the numbers getting involved in policy debates, more dialogue is<BR>> a better idea.<BR>><BR>> Secondly, these are early days. Do we want policies which have been decided<BR>> on by a tiny group of people (sometimes 2 or 3 votes approving of a policy <BR>> can be all it takes to get it passed) to direct this community? Yes, they<BR>> can be changed later (more voting!) but do we need to be setting them quite<BR>> yet?<BR>><BR>> Mopst people on this list aren't participating in these
votes, why? Is it <BR>> because you feel much the same way as I do? Are there too many votes on the<BR>> wiki at the moment?<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Campaigns-l mailing list<BR>> <A href="mailto:Campaigns-l@wikia.com">Campaigns-l@wikia.com</A><BR>> <A href="http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l">http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l</A><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>_______________________________________________ <BR>Campaigns-l mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:Campaigns-l@wikia.com">Campaigns-l@wikia.com</A><BR><A href="http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l">http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Campaigns-l mailing list<BR>Campaigns-l@wikia.com<BR>http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> 
<hr size=1>
O Yahoo! está de cara nova. Venha <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/br/tagline/spirit/*http://br.yahoo.com">conferir</a>!