[Search-l] What others are doing.
peter burden
peter.burden at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 20:06:20 UTC 2007
Hello,
I came across an interesting news story at
http://informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201202986
The article extolls AI as a way of better understanding user queries
however the following anonymous comment
really caught my eye
> Congratulations! You've totally missed the mark. The problem is not
> that the manner in which we enter search requests is cryptic nor that
> the search engines don't do a good job of determining what we want.
> The real problem is that they do a horrible job of determining what
> sites have reasonably valid information and eliminating the link farms
> and traps with no real content.
Incidentally spotted the following job ads in a related article
> Redmond, WA: Software Engineer in Live Search Data Mining team at Microsoft, Live Search Core Relevance group
> Redmond, WA: Software Engineer, Web Search Relevance at Microsoft
> Redmond, WA: Software Engineer, Live Search Dynamic Ranking at Microsoft
And finally I wonder, after Google's e-Bay debacle, how well web
advertising really works. Perhaps there's a
bit of a draught round the Googleplex.
More information about the Search-l
mailing list