[Search-l] I'm awake too... plus, an idea
Stavros Macrakis
macrakis at alum.mit.edu
Tue May 1 13:45:31 UTC 2007
On 4/30/07, Ed Whittaker <epicurus at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...there would be no reason to select only one algorithm necessarily or
> evolve only one. You could use *all* your algorithms up to that point and
> perhaps use the verdicts on each of them to weight the contribution from
> each algorithm.
>
That is what all the major search engines do these days. Though everyone
has heard of PageRank, HITS/ExpertRank, TrustRank, etc., the elegant
published algorithms are just one part of ranking.
You might want to read:
An interview with Apostolos Gerasoulis (scientist) and Jim Lanzone (VP) of
Ask:
http://www.e-marketing-news.co.uk/Feb05/apostolos.html
Beyond PageRank, by three Microsoft/MSN researchers:
http://www2006.org/programme/files/xhtml/3101/p3101-Richardson.html
Good reading,
-s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/search-l/attachments/20070501/3973ab1d/attachment.html
More information about the Search-l
mailing list