[Vim-l] Workflow (was: Re: Comments vs. discussion page)
John Beckett
johnb.beckett at gmail.com
Sun Sep 23 03:29:28 UTC 2007
Sebastian Menge wrote:
> One thought of mine was to categorize as much as possible
> first / fast, then go to vim at vim.org to attract specialists
> for different topics to review those articles they are
> interested in them selves: developers of specific languages,
> plugin-writers, syntax-gurus etc.
Yes - that's a good idea. I'll get on to it RSN...
Categories are really hard. I just edited 11 tips that had '{{' in the text
(the braces cause confusion re template syntax). The tips needed quite a lot
of tweaking (I thought I may as well clean them up), and I took quite a bit
of time. However, I just couldn't face putting them into categories (they
didn't fit simply into what I understand of our categories).
> When we ask on vim at vim.org, we should perhaps be more
> specific: How about something like "the category of the
> month"?
Good. You may have noticed how I've tried to get a bit of interest from
vim_use, with spectacular failure. I was thinking of trying to prime Bram to
get behind a drive - to encourage participation.
John
More information about the Vim-l
mailing list