From johnq at wikia.com Wed Jan 3 10:18:51 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:18:51 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] test (please ignore) Message-ID: <459B830B.2070704@wikia.com> we're doing some maintenance... testing the lists... please ignore. From beesley at gmail.com Sat Jan 6 14:04:53 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:04:53 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay Message-ID: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's Mediation Committee. http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team Angela -- Angela Beesley Wikia.com From essjaywiki at gmail.com Sat Jan 6 14:19:38 2007 From: essjaywiki at gmail.com (Ryan Jordan) Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 09:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: <459FAEBD.5070603@gmail.com> References: <459FAEBD.5070603@gmail.com> Message-ID: <459FAFFA.8060301@gmail.com> Angela wrote: > > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > Mediation Committee. > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > Angela > > -- > Angela Beesley > Wikia.com > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > Thank you, Angela, I'm very pleased to be joining the Wikia team, and I look forward to working with everyone! -- Ryan Jordan Community Manager, Wikia Inc. www.wikia.com Username: Essjay essjay.wikia at gmail.com www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Essjay From scarecroe at gmail.com Sat Jan 6 14:44:53 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: <459FAFFA.8060301@gmail.com> References: <459FAEBD.5070603@gmail.com> <459FAFFA.8060301@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701060644q1a0eb794ib9d9f21929f16293@mail.gmail.com> Welcome, Ryan! -Scott On 1/6/07, Ryan Jordan wrote: > > Angela wrote: > > > > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > > Mediation Committee. > > > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > > > Angela > > > > -- > > Angela Beesley > > Wikia.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing list > > Wikia-l at wikia.com > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > > > Thank you, Angela, I'm very pleased to be joining the Wikia team, and I > look forward to working with everyone! > > -- > Ryan Jordan > Community Manager, Wikia Inc. > www.wikia.com > Username: Essjay > essjay.wikia at gmail.com > www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Essjay > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070106/8edd347b/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Sat Jan 6 19:59:25 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:59:25 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <459FFF9D.70400@wikia.com> Nice ! Welcome Essjay! John Q. Angela wrote: > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > Mediation Committee. > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > Angela > From duncan at wikia.com Sat Jan 6 21:56:48 2007 From: duncan at wikia.com (Matthew Silvey) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:56:48 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2E942FC5-1F20-4E55-B424-546BACFAC6F6@wikia.com> Welcome Essjay! Matt On Jan 6, 2007, at 6:04 AM, Angela wrote: > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > Mediation Committee. > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > Angela > > -- > Angela Beesley > Wikia.com > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From dimitar.tsonev at gmail.com Sat Jan 6 22:09:11 2007 From: dimitar.tsonev at gmail.com (Dimitar Tsonev) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:09:11 +0200 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: <2E942FC5-1F20-4E55-B424-546BACFAC6F6@wikia.com> References: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> <2E942FC5-1F20-4E55-B424-546BACFAC6F6@wikia.com> Message-ID: <9dd9628a0701061409t2c87d739odd8f9caa4ccb5f42@mail.gmail.com> Welcome Essjay! DCLXVI On 1/6/07, Matthew Silvey wrote: > > > Welcome Essjay! > > Matt > On Jan 6, 2007, at 6:04 AM, Angela wrote: > > > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > > Mediation Committee. > > > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > > > Angela > > > > -- > > Angela Beesley > > Wikia.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing list > > Wikia-l at wikia.com > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070107/1e081c6b/attachment.html From beesley at gmail.com Sat Jan 6 23:05:26 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:05:26 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] cache In-Reply-To: <757d22db0612081156w7a58f4f9j9767ff3cd590e12f@mail.gmail.com> References: <801553ab0612071322i7608c5dg6058f89bab3c4c4b@mail.gmail.com> <4578AD46.2090609@wikia.com> <757d22db0612081156w7a58f4f9j9767ff3cd590e12f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8b722b800701061505w27b4ac62gcb36a4535ac38aef@mail.gmail.com> > We have something similar although not nearly as old: > The following data is cached, and was last updated 19:18, 30 November 2006. > For what time interval are the caches set to expire, 7 days? I'm sorry your post was delayed. It had got caught up with 100s of spam messages to the list and was held for moderation since you weren't subscribed at the time. The special cache ought to be updating every day now. It seems to be working on the wikis I checked. Angela From Robin.Patterson at thomson.com Mon Jan 8 00:05:56 2007 From: Robin.Patterson at thomson.com (Robin.Patterson at thomson.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:05:56 +1300 Subject: [Wikia-l] cache; and advice to unsubscribed people Message-ID: <19E6234A7BDFE54583B83BBF5E604FB688BA22@TLRNZWLGMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM> I guess that may be related to the fact that my home address (which wasn't functioning between April and ten days ago) has received (in the last 24 hours) a notice starting "Your membership in the mailing list MediaWiki-l has been disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated 18-Apr-2006. You will not get any more messages from this list until you re-enable your membership. You will receive 2 more reminders like this before your membership in the list is deleted." I wonder whether (in view of the 8-month interval) that message was the original or one of the reminders. If the latter, it should not say "You will receive 2 more reminders ..."; maybe a matter for attention next time the drafters revise the message or the system. (When I get properly organised at home, I may resubscribe from there, but I won't expect the link in the notice to work.) Robin Patterson Proofreader and Chief Warden Brookers Ltd -----Original Message----- From: wikia-l-bounces at wikia.com [mailto:wikia-l-bounces at wikia.com] On Behalf Of Angela Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2007 12:05 To: Central Wikia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikia-l] cache > We have something similar although not nearly as old: > The following data is cached, and was last updated 19:18, 30 November 2006. > For what time interval are the caches set to expire, 7 days? I'm sorry your post was delayed. It had got caught up with 100s of spam messages to the list and was held for moderation since you weren't subscribed at the time. The special cache ought to be updating every day now. It seems to be working on the wikis I checked. Angela _______________________________________________ Wikia-l mailing list Wikia-l at wikia.com http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l From wikimagine at gmail.com Tue Jan 9 14:31:44 2007 From: wikimagine at gmail.com (pocket yellow) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:31:44 +0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: WELCOME ! 2007/1/6, Angela : > > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > Mediation Committee. > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > Angela > > -- > Angela Beesley > Wikia.com > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -- http://imagine.wealink.com/ QQ?553826221 MSN?wiki at live.it ???13186166869 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/9af90891/attachment.html From kaurjmeb at gmail.com Tue Jan 9 14:42:07 2007 From: kaurjmeb at gmail.com (KJ) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:42:07 +0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia's community team welcomes Essjay In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701060604oca1f027oaab8a445c81be73c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Welcome to join Wikia! 2007/1/9, pocket yellow : > > WELCOME ! > > 2007/1/6, Angela : > > > > I am very pleased to let you know that Ryan Jordan (known as > > User:Essjay) will be joining Wikia's Community Team next week. > > > > Ryan has been involved with Wikipedia since February 2005. He is an > > Administrator, Bureaucrat, Checkuser, Oversight & Boardvote on the > > English Wikipedia, and an admin on Wikimedia's Meta wiki, Wikimedia > > Commons,and Wikiquote. He has experience in running a number of > > different bots on the English Wikipedia and is chairman of Wikipedia's > > Mediation Committee. > > > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Team > > > > Angela > > > > -- > > Angela Beesley > > Wikia.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing list > > Wikia-l at wikia.com > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > > > > -- > http://imagine.wealink.com/ > QQ??553826221 > MSN??wiki at live.it > ??????13186166869 > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > -- KaurJmeb(KJ) Wikia ???Mwiki????:http://www.wikia.com/wiki/%E9%A6%96%E9%A0%81 ?????S????????http://zh.wikipedia.org My blog??http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kaurjmeb ??????????????~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/8a4b584a/attachment.html From scarecroe at gmail.com Tue Jan 9 17:34:41 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> Is the Lucene search gone for good, or is the current Google replacement just temporary? While I understand that the Google search maintains itself meaning that the tech team doesn't have nearly as much work to do for it, the Google search is inferior and doesn't allow for the preference modifications that Lucene does. No longer can I separate article title matches and page text matches or search in specific namespaces. Additionally, it doubles the amount of advertisements. Ads by Google appear on the right column of every page on Wikia as we all well know, but the Google search results have yet another box of ads sitting right next to the familiar column. Would it be possible to combine the Lucene and Google searches rather than having this downgrade? -Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/3e9a4cb1/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Tue Jan 9 19:19:43 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:19:43 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/fd0913d5/attachment.html From scarecroe at gmail.com Tue Jan 9 22:20:59 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701091420m6e97a3fbj4060c2df35cf264c@mail.gmail.com> Thanks, John. Do you have any idea when that will take place? -S On 1/9/07, John Q. wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > We're going to put in the ability to choose Lucene in your preferences for > the first two tab results (this wiki and all Wikia). Until there is a better > solution for the other two tabs, we'll use Google. :) > > Thanks, > John Q. > > > Scott Hanson wrote: > > Is the Lucene search gone for good, or is the current Google replacement > just temporary? > > While I understand that the Google search maintains itself meaning that > the tech team doesn't have nearly as much work to do for it, the Google > search is inferior and doesn't allow for the preference modifications that > Lucene does. No longer can I separate article title matches and page text > matches or search in specific namespaces. > > Additionally, it doubles the amount of advertisements. Ads by Google > appear on the right column of every page on Wikia as we all well know, but > the Google search results have yet another box of ads sitting right next to > the familiar column. > > Would it be possible to combine the Lucene and Google searches rather than > having this downgrade? > > -Scott > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing listWikia-l at wikia.comhttp://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/0cccddcb/attachment.html From toughpigs at gmail.com Wed Jan 10 00:35:12 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> Message-ID: Wow, yeah. I've been very unhappy with the broken search feature, but you've actually made it worse. It takes a while for Google to add new pages, so basically this means that I can't search for text that I added yesterday. This is a significant step backwards. John, when you say that you're going to make it possible to choose Lucene in the preferences, does that mean that every new reader is going to be set at the Google search as a default? Is it possible as an alternative to just make the Lucene work properly? Full-text search is kind of the backbone of a site like this. I don't want to be overdramatic, but I think without an effective search feature, the site will suffer tremendously. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/cb3d7dd4/attachment.html From toughpigs at gmail.com Wed Jan 10 00:53:20 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> Message-ID: PS. I also don't think Google indexes talk pages. That's another feature that we lose with the new search. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/dfffc438/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Wed Jan 10 00:53:47 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:53:47 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45A4391B.4030404@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/b8b049c7/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Wed Jan 10 00:59:50 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:59:50 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45A43A86.4080502@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/71dacece/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Wed Jan 10 01:01:14 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:01:14 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: <45A4391B.4030404@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> <45A4391B.4030404@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45A43ADA.2010801@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/59573882/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Wed Jan 10 03:45:44 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:45:44 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] new search In-Reply-To: <45A43ADA.2010801@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701090934s7d3b6212jac88434652d71bd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A3EACF.2000209@wikia.com> <45A4391B.4030404@wikia.com> <45A43ADA.2010801@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45A46168.3090703@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070109/689e4ffa/attachment.html From toughpigs at gmail.com Thu Jan 11 15:31:09 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] Moving article error Message-ID: There's a problem with moving articles right now -- it started last night. When I try to move an article, I get this error: *Fatal error*: Call to undefined function Notify() in * /usr/wikia/source/wiki16svn/extensions/LuceneNotifier.php* on line *40* -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070111/5e64fb73/attachment.html From inez at wikia.com Thu Jan 11 15:44:08 2007 From: inez at wikia.com (=?UTF-8?B?SW5leiBLb3JjennFhHNraQ==?=) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:44:08 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] Moving article error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45A65B48.7090006@wikia.com> Danny Horn wrote: > There's a problem with moving articles right now -- it started last > night. When I try to move an article, I get this error: > > *Fatal error*: Call to undefined function Notify() in > */usr/wikia/source/wiki16svn/extensions/LuceneNotifier.php* on line *40* On which Wikia did you notice that error? Are you sure that error still occur, because we had that problem today morning, but already solve it? Thanks, Inez From beesley at gmail.com Thu Jan 11 21:40:25 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:40:25 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] Moving article error In-Reply-To: <45A65B48.7090006@wikia.com> References: <45A65B48.7090006@wikia.com> Message-ID: <8b722b800701111340u7efbb63fg4c64069ec1f9a464@mail.gmail.com> > On which Wikia did you notice that error? > Are you sure that error still occur, because we had that problem today > morning, but already solve it? It was on the muppet wiki. Angela From beesley at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 00:31:30 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:31:30 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace Message-ID: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> Wikia now has a MySpace profile at http://www.myspace.com/wikia If you're a user of MySpace, please add us to your friends list. You could also make a profile for your own wiki as a way of promoting it to other MySpace users. If you have any suggestions for improving the Wikia profile, please let me know since I'm quite a newbie at this. :) Angela () From dimitar.tsonev at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 00:41:26 2007 From: dimitar.tsonev at gmail.com (Dimitar Tsonev) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:41:26 +0200 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9dd9628a0701121641u4139492ch2b834ca1572440c9@mail.gmail.com> Please post your suggestions here, because not only Angela is a newbie ;) DCLXVI On 1/13/07, Angela wrote: > > Wikia now has a MySpace profile at http://www.myspace.com/wikia > > If you're a user of MySpace, please add us to your friends list. You > could also make a profile for your own wiki as a way of promoting it > to other MySpace users. > > If you have any suggestions for improving the Wikia profile, please > let me know since I'm quite a newbie at this. :) > > Angela () > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070113/f53dbab2/attachment.html From chadlupkes at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 00:41:34 2007 From: chadlupkes at gmail.com (Chad Lupkes) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:41:34 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. Every time I do anything on that website I get at least 6 "invitations" from very friendly girls... Can we buy it back from NewsCorp? Maybe? Anyway, I'll add Wikia as a friend. Chad On 1/12/07, Angela wrote: > Wikia now has a MySpace profile at http://www.myspace.com/wikia > > If you're a user of MySpace, please add us to your friends list. You > could also make a profile for your own wiki as a way of promoting it > to other MySpace users. > > If you have any suggestions for improving the Wikia profile, please > let me know since I'm quite a newbie at this. :) > > Angela () > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From doug.muth at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 00:42:41 2007 From: doug.muth at gmail.com (Douglas Muth) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <367e1abe0701121642l13fb41b1u3160298aa646109@mail.gmail.com> On 1/12/07, Chad Lupkes wrote: > Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. Every time I do > anything on that website I get at least 6 "invitations" from very > friendly girls... Yeah, I've gotten lots of "friends spam" too. But, I don't think it hurts us to have a presence on there either. If more people find out about Wikia that way, then so much the better! -- User:Dmuth From chadlupkes at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 00:47:48 2007 From: chadlupkes at gmail.com (Chad Lupkes) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:48 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <367e1abe0701121642l13fb41b1u3160298aa646109@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> <367e1abe0701121642l13fb41b1u3160298aa646109@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <801553ab0701121647l28eaf218u19367a4c641289dc@mail.gmail.com> No, it doesn't hurt. It's just a poorly designed website. Chad On 1/12/07, Douglas Muth wrote: > On 1/12/07, Chad Lupkes wrote: > > Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. Every time I do > > anything on that website I get at least 6 "invitations" from very > > friendly girls... > > Yeah, I've gotten lots of "friends spam" too. > > But, I don't think it hurts us to have a presence on there either. If > more people find out about Wikia that way, then so much the better! > > -- User:Dmuth > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From essjay.wikia at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 04:15:22 2007 From: essjay.wikia at gmail.com (Ryan Jordan) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <367e1abe0701121642l13fb41b1u3160298aa646109@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> <367e1abe0701121642l13fb41b1u3160298aa646109@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45A85CDA.6050604@gmail.com> Douglas Muth wrote: > On 1/12/07, Chad Lupkes wrote: >> Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. Every time I do >> anything on that website I get at least 6 "invitations" from very >> friendly girls... > > Yeah, I've gotten lots of "friends spam" too. > > But, I don't think it hurts us to have a presence on there either. If > more people find out about Wikia that way, then so much the better! > > -- User:Dmuth > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > Some radio show host here was going off on this today; apparently, *everybody* gets friend spam. Perhaps Angela could go on the radio and say "If you're 12 and listening to my radio show, get some parents; I don't want to be your friend!" :-D Ryan -- Ryan Jordan Community Manager, Wikia Inc. www.wikia.com Username: Essjay essjay.wikia at gmail.com www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Essjay From toughpigs at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 14:46:41 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] IP problem Message-ID: There's a weird problem on Muppet Wiki right now -- apparently every IP address is set to 216.224.121.143. We tried to block a vandal, and it ended up blocking every user on the wiki. This happened before, a little while ago, so I'm sure you guys know how to fix it. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070113/378a6f8b/attachment.html From essjay.wikia at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 14:51:29 2007 From: essjay.wikia at gmail.com (Ryan Jordan) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] IP problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45A8F1F1.4030906@gmail.com> Danny Horn wrote: > There's a weird problem on Muppet Wiki right now -- apparently every > IP address is set to 216.224.121.143 . > > We tried to block a vandal, and it ended up blocking every user on the > wiki. This happened before, a little while ago, so I'm sure you guys > know how to fix it. > > > -- Danny > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > Yes, we're having a similar problem on Central, and have the tech team working on it now. We'll keep everyone posted on progress. Ryan -- Ryan Jordan Community Manager, Wikia Inc. www.wikia.com Username: Essjay essjay.wikia at gmail.com www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Essjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070113/ee6adf6e/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Sat Jan 13 15:42:44 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:42:44 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] IP problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45A8FDF4.4040601@wikia.com> Hi Danny, Yes, we brought a new server on-line just a little bit ago... we're about to take care of this. Thanks, John Q. Danny Horn wrote: > There's a weird problem on Muppet Wiki right now -- apparently every > IP address is set to 216.224.121.143 . > > We tried to block a vandal, and it ended up blocking every user on the > wiki. This happened before, a little while ago, so I'm sure you guys > know how to fix it. > > > -- Danny > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From sannse at tiscali.co.uk Sat Jan 13 16:21:34 2007 From: sannse at tiscali.co.uk (sannse) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:21:34 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] IP problem In-Reply-To: <45A8FDF4.4040601@wikia.com> References: <45A8FDF4.4040601@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45A9070E.3060302@tiscali.co.uk> I'm seeing this as fixed now (on the three wikis I checked). Thanks John. -- sannse ---- Lisa "sannse" Carter Wikia Community and Technical Support Team http://www.wikia.com/ Contact us at community at wikia.com John Q. wrote: > Hi Danny, > > Yes, we brought a new server on-line just a little bit ago... we're > about to take care of this. > > Thanks, > John Q. > > > Danny Horn wrote: >> There's a weird problem on Muppet Wiki right now -- apparently every >> IP address is set to 216.224.121.143 . >> >> We tried to block a vandal, and it ended up blocking every user on the >> wiki. This happened before, a little while ago, so I'm sure you guys >> know how to fix it. >> >> >> -- Danny >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikia-l mailing list >> Wikia-l at wikia.com >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > From johnq at wikia.com Sat Jan 13 16:23:01 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:23:01 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] IP problem In-Reply-To: <45A8FDF4.4040601@wikia.com> References: <45A8FDF4.4040601@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45A90765.5030800@wikia.com> Hi Danny, You should see normal IP addr's now. Let me know if you still see just the one. Thanks, John Q. John Q. wrote: > Hi Danny, > > Yes, we brought a new server on-line just a little bit ago... we're > about to take care of this. > > Thanks, > John Q. > > > Danny Horn wrote: >> There's a weird problem on Muppet Wiki right now -- apparently every >> IP address is set to 216.224.121.143 . >> >> We tried to block a vandal, and it ended up blocking every user on >> the wiki. This happened before, a little while ago, so I'm sure you >> guys know how to fix it. >> >> >> -- Danny >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikia-l mailing list >> Wikia-l at wikia.com >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l >> > From toughpigs at gmail.com Sat Jan 13 16:31:28 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] IP problem In-Reply-To: <45A90765.5030800@wikia.com> References: <45A8FDF4.4040601@wikia.com> <45A90765.5030800@wikia.com> Message-ID: Yeah, it looks good now. Thanks! -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070113/dfd71820/attachment.html From svc.romero at yahoo.com Sat Jan 13 22:00:09 2007 From: svc.romero at yahoo.com (svc.romero at yahoo.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:00:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace Message-ID: <20070113220009.85226.qmail@web37308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Am way too old for MySpace, but if you say so. Leo http://www.myspace.com/goodlives Message: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:31:30 +0000 From: Angela Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace To: "Central Wikia Mailing List" Message-ID: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Wikia now has a MySpace profile at http://www.myspace.com/wikia If you're a user of MySpace, please add us to your friends list. You could also make a profile for your own wiki as a way of promoting it to other MySpace users. If you have any suggestions for improving the Wikia profile, please let me know since I'm quite a newbie at this. :) Angela () ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070113/3bf6cc4e/attachment.html From jwales at wikia.com Sat Jan 13 20:41:47 2007 From: jwales at wikia.com (Jimmy Wales) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:41:47 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45A9440B.3060701@wikia.com> Chad Lupkes wrote: > Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. Every time I do > anything on that website I get at least 6 "invitations" from very > friendly girls... > > Can we buy it back from NewsCorp? Maybe? :) How about we get some people excited to build an open source alternative that actually respects the teens instead of abusing them with excessive advertising? Well, you know me. More ideas than I could ever have time for. :) But seriously, I have a friend who has a nice phrase "Myspace is not your space," expressing frustration with how badly they treat their users. --Jimbo From greenreaper at hotmail.com Sun Jan 14 00:27:55 2007 From: greenreaper at hotmail.com (Laurence Parry) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:27:55 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <45A9440B.3060701@wikia.com> Message-ID: >How about we get some people excited to build an open source alternative >that actually respects the teens instead of abusing them with excessive >advertising? > >Well, you know me. More ideas than I could ever have time for. :) > >But seriously, I have a friend who has a nice phrase "Myspace is not your >space," expressing frustration with how badly they treat their users. Over at furry we have had to remind people on several occasions that "WikiFur is not MySpace" ("...nor is it LiveJournal"). This is tricky because we do allow people to both create and contribute to articles about themselves. We've had a few problems where people were very keen on imparting their own "style" to the writing, and couldn't understand that the articles were primarily for our benefit, not for theirs. I'm constantly amazed that people are so very keen to tell the world about every feature of their daily lives and (in some cases) go into extraordinary detail about their bad habits and sexual proclivities. Still, if it makes them happy . . . just as long as they put their list of favourite toys on their user page. --- Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry http://greenreaper.co.uk/ - http://wikifur.com/ "Eternity lies ahead of us, and behind. Have *you* drunk your fill?" _________________________________________________________________ Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters From chadlupkes at gmail.com Sun Jan 14 01:59:45 2007 From: chadlupkes at gmail.com (Chad Lupkes) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:59:45 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] MySpace In-Reply-To: <45A9440B.3060701@wikia.com> References: <8b722b800701121631r7cab1ec0k9bef4a924bac676f@mail.gmail.com> <801553ab0701121641n6a2a271et3ea89c46a2cc072d@mail.gmail.com> <45A9440B.3060701@wikia.com> Message-ID: <801553ab0701131759we05eca3jc13d19a2f4f6cc88@mail.gmail.com> Orkut does exactly that, and it's used a lot in Brazil. Myspace has a monopoly in the US because it has a marketing budget, and because the domain name is capable of grabbing our attention. Imagine what we could have done if we had grabbed mywiki.com. Maybe Linspire would be willing to sell it to us. Chad On 1/13/07, Jimmy Wales wrote: > Chad Lupkes wrote: > > Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. Every time I do > > anything on that website I get at least 6 "invitations" from very > > friendly girls... > > > > Can we buy it back from NewsCorp? Maybe? > > :) > > How about we get some people excited to build an open source alternative > that actually respects the teens instead of abusing them with excessive > advertising? > > Well, you know me. More ideas than I could ever have time for. :) > > But seriously, I have a friend who has a nice phrase "Myspace is not > your space," expressing frustration with how badly they treat their users. > > --Jimbo > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From Robin.Patterson at thomson.com Mon Jan 15 00:06:37 2007 From: Robin.Patterson at thomson.com (Robin.Patterson at thomson.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:06:37 +1300 Subject: [Wikia-l] Alternatives to MySpace: maybe WikiVille Message-ID: <19E6234A7BDFE54583B83BBF5E604FB688BA37@TLRNZWLGMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM> (My employer has blocked access to MySpace, so I can't check from here whether I ever joined.) Surely Wikia can provide alternatives for young people?? If not, we could direct them to WikiVille, which already has some "reciprocal" links to Wikia. As an example of what it does, one of the newest pages is now at http://www.wikiville.org.uk/index.php/5th_Grade_at_Covington Regrettably, it still has very few "people excited to build an open source alternative that actually respects the teens". This contributor is disproportionally active but wondering whether he should bother; Wikia is much more satisfying. See http://www.wikiville.org.uk/index.php?title=User_talk:Robin_Patterson&di ff=prev&oldid=5058 for a second opinion. Robin Patterson On 1/13/07, Jimmy Wales wrote: > Chad Lupkes wrote: > > Honestly, my advice would be to not use MySpace. ..... > How about we get some people excited to build an open source alternative > that actually respects the teens instead of abusing them with excessive > advertising? > ..... From beesley at gmail.com Mon Jan 15 00:31:31 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:31:31 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] Alternatives to MySpace: maybe WikiVille In-Reply-To: <19E6234A7BDFE54583B83BBF5E604FB688BA37@TLRNZWLGMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM> References: <19E6234A7BDFE54583B83BBF5E604FB688BA37@TLRNZWLGMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM> Message-ID: <8b722b800701141631l3fb5815k1f9f73f359da2e8@mail.gmail.com> On 1/15/07, Robin.Patterson at thomson.com wrote: > (My employer has blocked access to MySpace, so I can't check from here > whether I ever joined.) > Surely Wikia can provide alternatives for young people?? We do hope to have more social networking type features in future. At the moment, we have a social.wikia.com which aims to be a bit like myspace but on a standard wiki. There is also teens.wikia.com for that age group, but so far it's only attracted vandals. Angela From scarecroe at gmail.com Mon Jan 15 18:47:13 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] slow wikis Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701151047x2b208f0sb4ad6352198b104d@mail.gmail.com> Most Wikia wikis seem to be at a crawl right now: Muppet, Bionic, Memory Alpha. Is there a network outage? Thanks, Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070115/7a49f1d1/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Mon Jan 15 18:49:35 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:49:35 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] slow wikis In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701151047x2b208f0sb4ad6352198b104d@mail.gmail.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701151047x2b208f0sb4ad6352198b104d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45ABCCBF.9090404@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070115/6b47b988/attachment.html From scarecroe at gmail.com Mon Jan 15 18:51:33 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] slow wikis In-Reply-To: <45ABCCBF.9090404@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701151047x2b208f0sb4ad6352198b104d@mail.gmail.com> <45ABCCBF.9090404@wikia.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701151051k79154365ve9633499ef17de88@mail.gmail.com> DOS attack? Things do seem better now, thanks! -S On 1/15/07, John Q. wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > We saw that and it looks like it's been addressed. It was an outside > program hitting our servers. > > Thanks, > Q. > > Scott Hanson wrote: > > Most Wikia wikis seem to be at a crawl right now: Muppet, Bionic, Memory > Alpha. > > Is there a network outage? > > Thanks, Scott > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing listWikia-l at wikia.comhttp://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070115/a1b7830d/attachment.html From scarecroe at gmail.com Mon Jan 15 19:08:39 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] slow wikis In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701151051k79154365ve9633499ef17de88@mail.gmail.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701151047x2b208f0sb4ad6352198b104d@mail.gmail.com> <45ABCCBF.9090404@wikia.com> <3b6cf93a0701151051k79154365ve9633499ef17de88@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701151108y776dca74u86cd619cd0d41892@mail.gmail.com> Hm, there still seem to be some intermittent leftovers of slowness... > On 1/15/07, John Q. wrote: > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > We saw that and it looks like it's been addressed. It was an outside > > program hitting our servers. > > > > Thanks, > > Q. > > > > Scott Hanson wrote: > > > > Most Wikia wikis seem to be at a crawl right now: Muppet, Bionic, > > Memory Alpha. > > > > Is there a network outage? > > > > Thanks, Scott > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing listWikia-l at wikia.comhttp://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing list > > Wikia-l at wikia.com > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070115/689c6281/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Mon Jan 15 19:13:14 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:13:14 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] slow wikis In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701151108y776dca74u86cd619cd0d41892@mail.gmail.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701151047x2b208f0sb4ad6352198b104d@mail.gmail.com> <45ABCCBF.9090404@wikia.com> <3b6cf93a0701151051k79154365ve9633499ef17de88@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701151108y776dca74u86cd619cd0d41892@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45ABD24A.9080401@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070115/e14abfc9/attachment.html From rsw154 at psu.edu Wed Jan 17 03:02:23 2007 From: rsw154 at psu.edu (Ryan Woodworth) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] Embedded image slowness Message-ID: <1169002941l.663704l.0l@psu.edu> Hi folks. I recently noticed that loading Doom Wiki pages on one of my machines seems to stall indefinitely at "www.google-analytics.com". Every image loads except for the main wiki icon in the upper left, and edits are still applied (so the workaround is just to hit the stop button). Obviously I don't expect anyone to investigate this on my account, since I am using an unmaintained browser and an unmaintained OS (Mozilla 1.2.1 on Mac OS 9.2.2). But I know that in programming, no problem is isolated, but is interconnected to all things; so I thought I'd mention it anyway in case it led upwards to something of significance. cheers r. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Woodworth Technical Expert, Second Class Department of Physics 104 Davey Laboratory, PMB 120 The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 From essjay.wikia at gmail.com Wed Jan 17 03:27:18 2007 From: essjay.wikia at gmail.com (Ryan Jordan) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] Embedded image slowness In-Reply-To: <1169002941l.663704l.0l@psu.edu> References: <1169002941l.663704l.0l@psu.edu> Message-ID: <45AD9796.5020201@gmail.com> Ryan Woodworth wrote: > Hi folks. I recently noticed that loading Doom Wiki pages on one of my machines > seems to stall indefinitely at "www.google-analytics.com". Every image loads > except for the main wiki icon in the upper left, and edits are still applied > (so the workaround is just to hit the stop button). > > Obviously I don't expect anyone to investigate this on my account, since I am > using an unmaintained browser and an unmaintained OS (Mozilla 1.2.1 on Mac OS > 9.2.2). But I know that in programming, no problem is isolated, but is > interconnected to all things; so I thought I'd mention it anyway in case it led > upwards to something of significance. > > cheers > r. > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > Ryan Woodworth Technical Expert, Second Class > Department of Physics 104 Davey Laboratory, PMB 120 > The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > I had a message pop up today asking about accepting a certificate for google-analytics.com; I didn't think a lot of it at the time, but I wonder if maybe that might be related? Ryan (Jordan) -- Ryan Jordan Community Manager, Wikia Inc. www.wikia.com Username: Essjay essjay.wikia at gmail.com www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Essjay From scarecroe at gmail.com Fri Jan 19 18:45:12 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] search function Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> First I'd like to say that I'm happy and relieved to see the search back to normal again. What a horrible nightmare it was having Google instead of Lucene. I'm also happy to see that categories come up in search results again -- a feature I'd been missing for months. However, in the trade-off, it appears that we've lost two things: text inside templates on a page and tables are not searchable. For example, searching for "gobagoo" on Muppet Wiki only gives you its reference on the talk page for Rowlf the Dog's Alternate Identities, and not its inclusion on the page itself -- I'm assuming because it's inside a table. For the template example, searching for the ISBN 0717282538, should bring up The Value of Imagination, but instead I get nothing. Is there a way to tweak the search so that these things which worked before will work again but without losing other features such as categories showing up in search results and the ability to search for two words appearing in the same article? Thanks, Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070119/b12b59a6/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Fri Jan 19 18:57:43 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:57:43 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] search function In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45B114A7.50800@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070119/45b205cf/attachment.html From scarecroe at gmail.com Fri Jan 19 19:01:30 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] search function In-Reply-To: <45B114A7.50800@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> <45B114A7.50800@wikia.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701191101h51a942bbk49ae1ba5b57fc121@mail.gmail.com> Do those modifications also account for text in a table? Thanks, John. -Scott On 1/19/07, John Q. wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > When we switched to MySQL full text search, that would find text inside > the templates... now that we're back to Lucene, I believe Inez put in > modifications so that it would still be able to do that but he's the expert > on what's getting indexed now... so let me check in with him and get back to > you. > > Thanks, > Q. > > > > Scott Hanson wrote: > > First I'd like to say that I'm happy and relieved to see the search back > to normal again. What a horrible nightmare it was having Google instead of > Lucene. > > I'm also happy to see that categories come up in search results again -- a > feature I'd been missing for months. However, in the trade-off, it appears > that we've lost two things: text inside templates on a page and tables are > not searchable. > > For example, searching for "gobagoo" on Muppet Wiki only gives you its > reference on the talk page for Rowlf the Dog's Alternate Identities, and not > its inclusion on the page itself -- I'm assuming because it's inside a > table. > > For the template example, searching for the ISBN 0717282538, should bring > up The Value of Imagination, but instead I get nothing. > > Is there a way to tweak the search so that these things which worked > before will work again but without losing other features such as categories > showing up in search results and the ability to search for two words > appearing in the same article? > > Thanks, Scott > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing listWikia-l at wikia.comhttp://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070119/3b099158/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Fri Jan 19 19:04:51 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:04:51 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] search function In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701191101h51a942bbk49ae1ba5b57fc121@mail.gmail.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> <45B114A7.50800@wikia.com> <3b6cf93a0701191101h51a942bbk49ae1ba5b57fc121@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45B11653.3060503@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070119/8cf9171e/attachment.html From beesley at gmail.com Sun Jan 21 00:51:21 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:51:21 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] Image problems on Wikia for a couple of hours Message-ID: <8b722b800701201651yee64edw44399171f8e536ef@mail.gmail.com> One of our fileservers needs rebooting which is causing some problems. The most noticeable issue will be with images - they can't currently be uploaded or deleted. Matthew is going to the colo to sort this out and we hope to have this resolved within the next few hours. Sorry about this problem. I'll send an update as soon as possible. Angela -- Angela Beesley Wikia.com From twotailedfox at gmail.com Sun Jan 21 01:05:25 2007 From: twotailedfox at gmail.com (TwoTailedFox) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:05:25 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] Image problems on Wikia for a couple of hours In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701201651yee64edw44399171f8e536ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701201651yee64edw44399171f8e536ef@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: As always, the Wikia efforts are appreciated. Glad I got my Wikia's Images sorted before this hapenned ^^ On 1/21/07, Angela wrote: > One of our fileservers needs rebooting which is causing some problems. > The most noticeable issue will be with images - they can't currently > be uploaded or deleted. > > Matthew is going to the colo to sort this out and we hope to have this > resolved within the next few hours. > > Sorry about this problem. I'll send an update as soon as possible. > > Angela > > -- > Angela Beesley > Wikia.com > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -- "I had a handle on life, but then it broke" From chadlupkes at gmail.com Sun Jan 21 03:26:33 2007 From: chadlupkes at gmail.com (Chad Lupkes) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:26:33 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Down Message-ID: <801553ab0701201926o1f04907cw16dc3f1cc3c75b57@mail.gmail.com> Woah. The entire domain looks like it's down hard. Chad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070120/f6f57fd0/attachment.html From doug.muth at gmail.com Sun Jan 21 03:31:02 2007 From: doug.muth at gmail.com (Douglas Muth) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] Down In-Reply-To: <801553ab0701201926o1f04907cw16dc3f1cc3c75b57@mail.gmail.com> References: <801553ab0701201926o1f04907cw16dc3f1cc3c75b57@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <367e1abe0701201931s237829fayba1ff46053066aff@mail.gmail.com> On 1/20/07, Chad Lupkes wrote: > Woah. The entire domain looks like it's down hard. Providing just a little more detail, here's what I'm seeing: The following error was encountered: * Unable to forward this request at this time. This request could not be forwarded to the origin server or to any parent caches. The most likely cause for this error is that: * The cache administrator does not allow this cache to make direct connections to origin servers, and * All configured parent caches are currently unreachable. -- User:Dmuth From duncan at wikia.com Sun Jan 21 03:31:20 2007 From: duncan at wikia.com (Matthew Silvey) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:31:20 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Down In-Reply-To: <801553ab0701201926o1f04907cw16dc3f1cc3c75b57@mail.gmail.com> References: <801553ab0701201926o1f04907cw16dc3f1cc3c75b57@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Chad, One of our key servers had a bit of a problem. During the reboot the operating system decided it needed a full integrity check. It should be back up in a few minutes. Matthew On Jan 20, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Chad Lupkes wrote: > Woah. The entire domain looks like it's down hard. > > Chad > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l From duncan at wikia.com Sun Jan 21 06:02:11 2007 From: duncan at wikia.com (Matthew Silvey) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:02:11 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Down In-Reply-To: References: <801553ab0701201926o1f04907cw16dc3f1cc3c75b57@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <996FC75B-24A0-4DC9-AB2B-1C6E236DB469@wikia.com> Things should be up and running again. Let us know if you see any further issues. Matthew On Jan 20, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Matthew Silvey wrote: > > Chad, > > One of our key servers had a bit of a problem. During the reboot > the operating system decided it needed a full integrity check. > It should be back up in a few minutes. > > Matthew > On Jan 20, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Chad Lupkes wrote: > >> Woah. The entire domain looks like it's down hard. >> >> Chad >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikia-l mailing list >> Wikia-l at wikia.com >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From johnq at wikia.com Sun Jan 21 06:07:47 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:07:47 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] server out... Message-ID: <45B30333.2030403@wikia.com> Hi everyone, We had a central server go out tonight. No data was at risk through any of this. It took us a little bit longer than expected to get a replacement server in place... sorry about that. As you know we've been working the last few months to make the site faster, better, and increase our ability to scale as Wikia has been getting bigger. Behind the scenes we've been introducing more hardware and secondary machines for just such an event as this. In this case, it was a server whose secondary wasn't in place yet (it's literally in the mail). Sorry for the inconvenience and we'll be reviewing exactly what happened here to see how we can do handle this better and faster. Thanks, John Q. From scarecroe at gmail.com Sun Jan 21 16:59:01 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] server out... In-Reply-To: <45B30333.2030403@wikia.com> References: <45B30333.2030403@wikia.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701210859i3df7fdd8rf0d2c1fe446ab3ff@mail.gmail.com> Thanks for the update, John. Glad everything worked out okay, On 1/21/07, John Q. wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We had a central server go out tonight. No data was at risk through any > of this. It took us a little bit longer than expected to get a > replacement server in place... sorry about that. As you know we've been > working the last few months to make the site faster, better, and > increase our ability to scale as Wikia has been getting bigger. Behind > the scenes we've been introducing more hardware and secondary machines > for just such an event as this. In this case, it was a server whose > secondary wasn't in place yet (it's literally in the mail). > > Sorry for the inconvenience and we'll be reviewing exactly what happened > here to see how we can do handle this better and faster. > > Thanks, > John Q. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070121/55feeaed/attachment.html From inez at wikia.com Mon Jan 22 10:45:00 2007 From: inez at wikia.com (=?UTF-8?B?SW5leiBLb3JjennFhHNraQ==?=) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:45:00 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] search function In-Reply-To: <45B11653.3060503@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> <45B114A7.50800@wikia.com> <3b6cf93a0701191101h51a942bbk49ae1ba5b57fc121@mail.gmail.com> <45B11653.3060503@wikia.com> Message-ID: <45B495AC.2060705@wikia.com> Hi, Yes, modification in our new search engine account for text in table and shared templates too. I will check what's wrong with indexing http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Rowlf_the_Dog%27s_Alternate_Identities and let you know. Regards, Inez John Q. wrote: > I need Inez to give me an authoritative answer because he wrote the code > to get Lucene working for us across wikis again. :) I should have an > answer daytime Poland time... and I'll let you know as soon as I know. > > Thanks, > Q. > > > Scott Hanson wrote: >> Do those modifications also account for text in a table? >> >> Thanks, John. >> >> -Scott >> >> >> On 1/19/07, *John Q.* > wrote: >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> When we switched to MySQL full text search, that would find text >> inside the templates... now that we're back to Lucene, I believe >> Inez put in modifications so that it would still be able to do >> that but he's the expert on what's getting indexed now... so let >> me check in with him and get back to you. >> >> Thanks, >> Q. >> >> >> >> Scott Hanson wrote: >>> First I'd like to say that I'm happy and relieved to see the >>> search back to normal again. What a horrible nightmare it was >>> having Google instead of Lucene. >>> >>> I'm also happy to see that categories come up in search results >>> again -- a feature I'd been missing for months. However, in the >>> trade-off, it appears that we've lost two things: text inside >>> templates on a page and tables are not searchable. >>> >>> For example, searching for "gobagoo" on Muppet Wiki only gives >>> you its reference on the talk page for Rowlf the Dog's Alternate >>> Identities, and not its inclusion on the page itself -- I'm >>> assuming because it's inside a table. >>> >>> For the template example, searching for the ISBN 0717282538, >>> should bring up The Value of Imagination, but instead I get nothing. >>> >>> Is there a way to tweak the search so that these things which >>> worked before will work again but without losing other features >>> such as categories showing up in search results and the ability >>> to search for two words appearing in the same article? >>> >>> Thanks, Scott >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikia-l mailing list >>> Wikia-l at wikia.com >>> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikia-l mailing list >> Wikia-l at wikia.com >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikia-l mailing list >> Wikia-l at wikia.com >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l From scarecroe at gmail.com Mon Jan 22 18:02:57 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] search function In-Reply-To: <45B495AC.2060705@wikia.com> References: <3b6cf93a0701191045t5d2d4c78jf1127d3c27bd986@mail.gmail.com> <45B114A7.50800@wikia.com> <3b6cf93a0701191101h51a942bbk49ae1ba5b57fc121@mail.gmail.com> <45B11653.3060503@wikia.com> <45B495AC.2060705@wikia.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701221002l6ca6826av5208d2478c6bb034@mail.gmail.com> That's great that you're looking into that Inez. How about text within a template on a page. For example, searching for 0679412034 should get me Jim Henson: The Works. -S On 1/22/07, Inez Korczy?ski wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, modification in our new search engine account for text in table and > shared templates too. I will check what's wrong with indexing > http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Rowlf_the_Dog%27s_Alternate_Identities and > let you know. > > Regards, > Inez > > > > John Q. wrote: > > I need Inez to give me an authoritative answer because he wrote the code > > to get Lucene working for us across wikis again. :) I should have an > > answer daytime Poland time... and I'll let you know as soon as I know. > > > > Thanks, > > Q. > > > > > > Scott Hanson wrote: > >> Do those modifications also account for text in a table? > >> > >> Thanks, John. > >> > >> -Scott > >> > >> > >> On 1/19/07, *John Q.* > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Scott, > >> > >> When we switched to MySQL full text search, that would find text > >> inside the templates... now that we're back to Lucene, I believe > >> Inez put in modifications so that it would still be able to do > >> that but he's the expert on what's getting indexed now... so let > >> me check in with him and get back to you. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Q. > >> > >> > >> > >> Scott Hanson wrote: > >>> First I'd like to say that I'm happy and relieved to see the > >>> search back to normal again. What a horrible nightmare it was > >>> having Google instead of Lucene. > >>> > >>> I'm also happy to see that categories come up in search results > >>> again -- a feature I'd been missing for months. However, in the > >>> trade-off, it appears that we've lost two things: text inside > >>> templates on a page and tables are not searchable. > >>> > >>> For example, searching for "gobagoo" on Muppet Wiki only gives > >>> you its reference on the talk page for Rowlf the Dog's Alternate > >>> Identities, and not its inclusion on the page itself -- I'm > >>> assuming because it's inside a table. > >>> > >>> For the template example, searching for the ISBN 0717282538, > >>> should bring up The Value of Imagination, but instead I get > nothing. > >>> > >>> Is there a way to tweak the search so that these things which > >>> worked before will work again but without losing other features > >>> such as categories showing up in search results and the ability > >>> to search for two words appearing in the same article? > >>> > >>> Thanks, Scott > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Wikia-l mailing list > >>> Wikia-l at wikia.com > >>> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikia-l mailing list > >> Wikia-l at wikia.com > >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikia-l mailing list > >> Wikia-l at wikia.com > >> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing list > > Wikia-l at wikia.com > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070122/91d4d42f/attachment.html From beesley at gmail.com Tue Jan 23 17:47:10 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:47:10 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] New calendar feature Message-ID: <8b722b800701230947q6b954aa8ufd067d7ff9635e4d@mail.gmail.com> A new calendar feature developed by Wikia has recently been installed. You can activate it on your wiki by typing on any page. When you've saved the page, you'll see an "add an event" link which takes you to a form to create the event, which will be saved as a page on your wiki and will appear in the calendar. See http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Calendar for more information. Feedback is welcomed at http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:New_calendar_feature Angela From memory_alpha at gmx.de Wed Jan 24 13:05:16 2007 From: memory_alpha at gmx.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Florian_K=E4utner=22?=) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:05:16 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] New calendar feature In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701230947q6b954aa8ufd067d7ff9635e4d@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701230947q6b954aa8ufd067d7ff9635e4d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070124130516.195400@gmx.net> Hi Angela, hello list, > See http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Calendar for more information. this looks great. I don't know if my problem is related to this calender but it came up at about the same time. If you see a "Star Trek: Next Genration" article on Memory Alpha, you will see messed up tables: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation - just scroll down to the season listing. It looks like wiki tables inside templates are stripped down to plain text somehow. This effect is seen on the mainpage of the German section, too. And is was not before a few hours ago; I did edit the mainpage yesterday and it looked good then. You someone can help out, thanks in advance. Florian From emil at wikia.com Wed Jan 24 13:17:47 2007 From: emil at wikia.com (Emil Podlaszewski) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:17:47 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] New calendar feature In-Reply-To: <20070124130516.195400@gmx.net> References: <8b722b800701230947q6b954aa8ufd067d7ff9635e4d@mail.gmail.com> <20070124130516.195400@gmx.net> Message-ID: <45B75C7B.4030604@wikia.com> Hi Florian, We were deploying some new code today and there was one patch more than needed. However now it should be fixed. Please confirm. Emil Florian K?utner wrote: > Hi Angela, hello list, > >> See http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Calendar for more information. > > this looks great. I don't know if my problem is related to this calender but it came up at about the same time. > > If you see a "Star Trek: Next Genration" article on Memory Alpha, you will see messed up tables: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation - just scroll down to the season listing. > > It looks like wiki tables inside templates are stripped down to plain text somehow. This effect is seen on the mainpage of the German section, too. And is was not before a few hours ago; I did edit the mainpage yesterday and it looked good then. > > You someone can help out, thanks in advance. > > Florian > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > From memory_alpha at gmx.de Wed Jan 24 15:10:38 2007 From: memory_alpha at gmx.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Florian_K=E4utner=22?=) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:10:38 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] New calendar feature In-Reply-To: <45B75C7B.4030604@wikia.com> References: <8b722b800701230947q6b954aa8ufd067d7ff9635e4d@mail.gmail.com> <20070124130516.195400@gmx.net> <45B75C7B.4030604@wikia.com> Message-ID: <20070124151038.195440@gmx.net> Hi Emil, > We were deploying some new code today and there was one patch more than > needed. However now it should be fixed. Please confirm. Confirmed! Looks very fine again. Plus I've a new catch-phrase for upcoming deployments in my office ("one patch more than needed"). Thanks again! Florian From duncan at wikia.com Thu Jan 25 03:20:39 2007 From: duncan at wikia.com (Matthew Silvey) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:20:39 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wiki Stats Maintenance Message-ID: <27B3EC17-D94A-4A16-B6EF-0FD82DDE33A8@wikia.com> Folks, We need to do some maintenance work tonight which will prevent wiki stats from running tonight. They will resume tomorrow. If this will cause any hardship let us know so we can re-schedule. Matthew From beesley at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 22:03:20 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:03:20 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views Message-ID: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> In November last year, we took a sample of page views to measure how many were from non-logged in users. I've just published the results at http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Page_views We found that exactly 90% of page views were from users who were not logged in. Some exceptions to 90-10 rule are: o High: + Star Wars Fanon with 70.3% registered + Central Wikia with 38% - 48% registered + Cybernations with 30.6% registered o Low: + Dofus with 3.2% registered + EVCHK with 3.1% registered + Smallville with 2.6% registered + 24 with 1.8% registered + Spanking Art with 1% registered See http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Page_views for the stats on some of the other most visited wikis. Angela From scarecroe at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 22:10:33 2007 From: scarecroe at gmail.com (Scott Hanson) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> Wow, surprsing results. I'd have had no idea so many people were visiting Muppet Wiki who weren't involved in the project. That's encouraging. -S On 1/25/07, Angela wrote: > > In November last year, we took a sample of page views to measure how > many were from non-logged in users. I've just published the results at > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Page_views > > We found that exactly 90% of page views were from users who were not > logged in. Some exceptions to 90-10 rule are: > o High: > + Star Wars Fanon with 70.3% registered > + Central Wikia with 38% - 48% registered > + Cybernations with 30.6% registered > o Low: > + Dofus with 3.2% registered > + EVCHK with 3.1% registered > + Smallville with 2.6% registered > + 24 with 1.8% registered > + Spanking Art with 1% registered > > See http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Page_views for the stats on some of the > other most visited wikis. > > Angela > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070125/4e22c2ff/attachment.html From beesley at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 22:13:53 2007 From: beesley at gmail.com (Angela) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:13:53 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> On 1/25/07, Scott Hanson wrote: > Wow, surprsing results. I'd have had no idea so many people were visiting > Muppet Wiki who weren't involved in the project. That's encouraging. In some ways it is encouraging, but at the same time, you should think about why they're not involved in the project - how could you make these random visitors stay around and become editors? At http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html Nielsen suggests: making it easier to contribute making participation a side effect letting users build their contributions by modifying existing templates rather than creating complete entities rewarding participants for contributing promoting quality contributors Angela From twotailedfox at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 22:18:41 2007 From: twotailedfox at gmail.com (TwoTailedFox) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:18:41 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Considering how often the logged in users that I know of and I access the Yu-Gi-Oh Wikia on a daiy basis, 93.2% unregistered is -very- encouraging. I think it's showing how well the Wikia is being passed around by word of mouth. On 1/25/07, Scott Hanson wrote: > Wow, surprsing results. I'd have had no idea so many people were visiting > Muppet Wiki who weren't involved in the project. That's encouraging. > > -S > > > > On 1/25/07, Angela wrote: > > In November last year, we took a sample of page views to measure how > > many were from non-logged in users. I've just published the results at > > http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Page_views > > > > We found that exactly 90% of page views were from users who were not > > logged in. Some exceptions to 90-10 rule are: > > o High: > > + Star Wars Fanon with 70.3% registered > > + Central Wikia with 38% - 48% registered > > + Cybernations with 30.6% registered > > o Low: > > + Dofus with 3.2% registered > > + EVCHK with 3.1% registered > > + Smallville with 2.6% registered > > + 24 with 1.8% registered > > + Spanking Art with 1% registered > > > > See http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Page_views for the stats on > some of the > > other most visited wikis. > > > > Angela > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikia-l mailing list > > Wikia-l at wikia.com > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > > > -- "I had a handle on life, but then it broke" From jasonr at wikia.com Thu Jan 25 23:37:48 2007 From: jasonr at wikia.com (Jason Richey) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:37:48 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] Mailing list server move Message-ID: <45B93F4C.2000708@wikia.com> Hello everyone. We are going to be moving all of our mailing lists and corporate email addresses to a new server in the next half hour. I don't foresee any problems with the move, but I do expect to have a little bit of downtime, where mail will be queued for later delivery. Please, if you notice any trouble with the system, let me know. If you ARE seeing email trouble, you can be sure to reach me using an alternate address, "jasonr at wikia-inc.com", or via IRC as "JasonR" I'm planning the move for 11:59pm UTC (just under half an hour from now), and I expect it to take less than half an hour to complete. -- Jason Richey http://www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Jasonr From jasonr at wikia.com Fri Jan 26 01:03:54 2007 From: jasonr at wikia.com (Jason Richey) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:03:54 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] mailing lists moved Message-ID: <45B9537A.4030108@wikia.com> The mailing list move is complete, and delivery should be resuming as normal. Please let me know if you experience any problems with the system. -- Jason Richey http://www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Jasonr From toughpigs at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 03:18:58 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > In some ways it is encouraging, but at the same time, you should think > about why they're not involved in the project - how could you make > these random visitors stay around and become editors? I dunno. Snacks? The thought that occurs to me is: Look at all those people who are taking advantage of my hard work. We should charge them admission or something. It's only fair. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070125/6d6b6198/attachment.html From essjay.wikia at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 03:29:21 2007 From: essjay.wikia at gmail.com (Ryan Jordan) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:29:21 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> Danny Horn wrote: > > In some ways it is encouraging, but at the same time, you should think > about why they're not involved in the project - how could you make > these random visitors stay around and become editors? > > > > I dunno. Snacks? > > The thought that occurs to me is: Look at all those people who are > taking advantage of my hard work. We should charge them admission or > something. It's only fair. > > > -- Danny > I would suggest that we already do that: If non-logged in users are 90% of our page views, then they are also going to be 90% (or more) of the ones clicking the ads that pay to keep the site running. Ryan -- Ryan Jordan Community Manager, Wikia Inc. www.wikia.com Username: Essjay essjay.wikia at gmail.com www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Essjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070125/07ba6402/attachment.html From markdarb at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 03:45:34 2007 From: markdarb at gmail.com (Mark William Darbyshire) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:45:34 +1300 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> Message-ID: <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> I'd agree. The ads are sufficient. How could we possibly attract more people to our community if they have to pay? My idea of Wikia is that it's a website of free content released under the GFDL, just like Wikipedia, but that it's for in-depth sites about various topics instead of encyclopedic articles. As editors on Wikia we should be happy to devote our time to a good cause, and expect nothing in return except for the satisfaction. It's great that we're getting so many unregistered users if it indicates that they're new users. But could a large percentage of those unregistered users be registered users who forget to log in? I know I forget to log in from time to time. And if they are new to Wikia, it's a shame they're not all sticking around (or at least they're not all creating accounts). Ultimately, I don't think we can ever hope to get the majority of visitors to actually contribute (and it's the same on Wikipedia). But wikis do need to appeal to those who would be interested in contributing. It's just encouraging to know that the wikis we're working on are being visited by other people, and it reminds us that there are more people out there who are visiting Wikia and who we should encourage to make edits. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/60b1d3b5/attachment.html From Robin.Patterson at thomson.com Fri Jan 26 06:09:44 2007 From: Robin.Patterson at thomson.com (Robin.Patterson at thomson.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:09:44 +1300 Subject: [Wikia-l] Wikia page views; regulars forgetting to log in? - or visitors to encourage Message-ID: <19E6234A7BDFE54583B83BBF5E604FB688BA74@TLRNZWLGMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM> I agree with Mark 100%. And I've read with great interest the page Angela referred us to - http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html . A summary or paraphrase of each of those points should be in the second half of http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Improving_your_Wikia. And like much of that page of ours it should be on the Starter Wikia; but there's nowhere I can find on the Starter Wikia where anyone can suggest improvements to the locked pages. As for forgetting to log in - I do that a lot, but because I've "preferred" a skin that looks so different from the standard I get a clear reminder long before I hit the Save button. Robin Patterson ________________________________ From: wikia-l-bounces at wikia.com [mailto:wikia-l-bounces at wikia.com] On Behalf Of Mark William Darbyshire Sent: Friday, 26 January 2007 16:46 To: Central Wikia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views I'd agree. The ads are sufficient. How could we possibly attract more people to our community if they have to pay? My idea of Wikia is that it's a website of free content released under the GFDL, just like Wikipedia, but that it's for in-depth sites about various topics instead of encyclopedic articles. As editors on Wikia we should be happy to devote our time to a good cause, and expect nothing in return except for the satisfaction. It's great that we're getting so many unregistered users if it indicates that they're new users. But could a large percentage of those unregistered users be registered users who forget to log in? I know I forget to log in from time to time. And if they are new to Wikia, it's a shame they're not all sticking around (or at least they're not all creating accounts). Ultimately, I don't think we can ever hope to get the majority of visitors to actually contribute (and it's the same on Wikipedia). But wikis do need to appeal to those who would be interested in contributing. It's just encouraging to know that the wikis we're working on are being visited by other people, and it reminds us that there are more people out there who are visiting Wikia and who we should encourage to make edits. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/8460b13b/attachment.html From toughpigs at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 14:20:59 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Yeah, I was just kidding about charging people admission. My serious point is that 90% unregistered visitors might be a good thing; it's a sign that the wiki has content that's worth reading. We want wikis to be successful projects that lots of people contribute to, but we also want the end result to be something that the general public can use as a resource. Looking through those stats on pageviews, it's not clear that a higher percentage of registered users means a better or more accessible wiki. I see a different story. Starwars is the biggest and most successful site on Wikia by any measure, and their registered user ratio is 7.3%. Memory Alpha's ratio is 4.7%. Starwars has close to 300 contributors in a month; Memory Alpha has over a hundred. They're attracting a lot of contributors -- an those contributors are creating such a valuable resource that they're bringing in even more people who want to read it. Ditto for Marvel Database (4.3%), Dofus (3.2%), Halo (6.0%), Muppet Wiki (4.6%) and Yugioh (6.8%). The highest registered user ratio that you quote on the page is SWfanon, with 70.3%. That's great, and SWfanon is a successful wiki -- but I don't think that should be the model for other projects. They have a high ratio because it's essentially a closed system -- the wiki is about the contributors. That brings in a healthy group of contributors, but people outside that group have no interest in reading it. To a lesser extent, Cybernations (30.6%) and Furry (13.6%) also encourage contributors to add themselves (or their nations/avatars) to the wiki. In those three cases, the percentage of registered users might even track the percentage of "personal" content on the site. (And the same could be said about Central, with 38%.) So maybe there's two ways to have a successful wiki. One is to build a site with useful information, which will attract a 5-10% registered user ratio. The other is to build a site around a particular group of contributors, which doesn't attract a lot of outside readers, but builds a strong base of devoted users. If Wikia is interested in having more of those "group" wikis, then maybe we could consider opening the site up to things like clubs, high schools or fraternities. They wouldn't necessarily be of particular interest to the outside world -- but, as with SWfanon, you could attract a group of 100 contributors who check the site all the time. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/65234178/attachment.html From toughpigs at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 15:06:26 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: By the way, I also just looked at Jakob Nielsen's article, and it doesn't make sense. I hope that article isn't being used as a model for Wikia. Nielsen's premise is that contributors are good, and users are bad. Calling them "lurkers" implies that these people are parasites, rather than readers or customers. He essentially says that every user should contribute to every website that they use -- Wikipedia, Amazon, Netflix, blogs. According to Nielsen, we should be leaving traces of ourselves behind everywhere we go, whether we have anything useful to contribute or not. He says that "only" 5% of internet users have their own weblogs, as if that's a requirement. Even "worse" is that "only" 0.1% of users post every day. So it's not enough to use the internet as a tool; we also have a responsibility to report in on a daily basis. Because there's a fairly consistent 1% participation on each website or blog, he seems to think that it's the same 1% everywhere, as if the guy who contributes all those Amazon reviews is also writing all the Wikipedia articles, and commenting on all the blogs. Those are all different people. I think the useful way to look at this is to know the percentage of internet users that contribute to *any* website. That percentage would be much higher. It's okay to contribute to some sites and just read others. In fact, it's okay not to contribute at all. He cites Amazon throughout the article, and his analysis is wrong in every respect. He puts this in bold: "A quick glance at Amazon.com, for example, showed that the site had sold thousands of copies of a book that had only 12 reviews, meaning that *less than 1% of customers contribute reviews*." Which goes to show that just because you know how to calculate a percentage doesn't mean that you know what it means. What that figure actually means is that 1% of the customers who bought that book reviewed that book. It's possible to buy ten books and only review one; you don't have to review every single book that you buy in order to be a contributor. That percentage also ignores things like people who bought multiple copies of the book as gifts. Having set the bar for participation on Amazon fairly high, he then gives a pat on the back to Netflix: "Netflix lets users rate movies by clicking a star rating, which is much easier than writing a natural-language review." Which is true, and that's a good point -- but Amazon has a star rating too. You can click on "Rate this Item" on any page. Nielsen goes on to say, "Even better, let users participate with zero effort by making their contributions a side effect of something else they're doing. For example, Amazon's *"people who bought this book, bought these other books"* recommendations are a side effect of people buying books." So, despite his complaints that Amazon is an example of "participation inequity", it seems like the site is actually providing a rich network of ways that customers can participate. Sure, only a select few are going to take the time to write a whole review and then post it on the internet for everyone to see. But there's lots of other ways to contribute -- rating whether a review was helpful or not, rating each book, making "lists". Even the act of browsing and buying books is recorded, to use as recommendations for others -- which means that Amazon's participation rate is 100%. In general, Nielsen doesn't understand contributors. We don't do it because we think we have to. If we had to write a book report every time we bought something on Amazon, we'd go back to buying books at Borders. We're not getting paid for it -- in fact, we're paying Amazon for the book. We're customers, not slacker employees, and we don't have to help if we don't want to. We participate because it's fun, and we want to show off. We're self-absorbed enough to think that other people will be interested in what we have to say. And besides, we like writing one of the six reviews on an Amazon page. If there were a thousand reviews for every single book, we wouldn't waste our time writing review #1,001. We want to write review #1, or at least review #10, because then we'll know that other people are reading what we write. So in other words, Jakob Nielsen has no idea what he's talking about. I'd tell him so, but there doesn't seem to be a way to leave comments on his page. The hypocrite. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/3e645001/attachment.html From greenreaper at hotmail.com Fri Jan 26 15:50:43 2007 From: greenreaper at hotmail.com (Laurence Parry) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com><3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com><8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com><45B97591.9030805@gmail.com><44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > So in other words, Jakob Nielsen has no idea what he's talking about. I'd > tell him so, but there doesn't seem to be a way to leave comments on his > page. The hypocrite. Nielson's contact details are right at the bottom of the front page. He's reachable by email - I've done so myself. As for his message . . . for his audience, I think he's pretty much spot on. He is writing for specific customers - the people who run websites, often large, content-based ones. It is typically viewed as advantageous *to the site owner* to have people contributing as much as possible in as many ways as possible. If you can make it so that everyone contributes reviews all the time, your site will probably be more attractive to potential users than another site where only 10% of users write reviews, or they only do so 10% of the time. More content is assumed to be better, even if it is not all of a high quality, just as long as it is on average not of _negative_ quality such that it that detracts from the site. If you can find a method to promote good content to the top of the pile, or to take advantage of the people who do not deliberately contribute and have them make stealth contributions, that is a bonus, and counteracts some of the negatives (for example, people not wanting to contribute quality work because they feel they will be lost in the mass may desire to if they see they have a chance to be promoted to the top - this would be "Featured articles" on Wikipedia and elsewhere). If you are running a site where, say, personal opinions or personal knowledge/experiences form a large part of the content, I would say that it is generally best to have as many people giving them as possible. This assumes that everyone's contributions have positive value, or at least that the end result of any random assortment of contributors is likely to be positive. This is highly debatable, but most wikis are setup is to assume that - and wikis have been quite successful in delivering sites with lots of useful information. On highly specific topics where there is specialized knowledge, it may not be the case; indeed, this has been a concern for many Wikipedia articles, and some Wikia sites. At that point, people often try to limit or bias contributions towards experts, with varying success. It is possible to have really good high-quality sites that have very few contributors on a well-defined topic. For example, this guy (alone) does webcam reviews and is very highly rated for them: http://cowboyfrank.net/webcams/index.htm However, if the topic is popular enough, they tend to be overcome in the end by the sheer mass of content offered by the sites that have those 1001 reviews (or articles, or whatever). MSN is a popular site in part because, even though it may not have the utmost experts on any particular topic, it has a lot of "pretty good" content on a lot of topics. Similarly, Amazon isn't the place to go for consistently good webcam reviews, but it _does_ have an awful lot of them, and they usually average out to a good estimation of a camera's capabilities. Oh, and you do have a responsibility to report in every day. Otherwise, you're not giving as much to the community as you could be. Stop slacking! :-) --- Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry From toughpigs at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 16:07:47 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I agree that more reviews is good -- but more customers buying books is even better. If your attitude about your customers is that they're not doing enough volunteer work for you, then you're going to make bad decisions that may end up alienating both the reviewers and the book-buyers. On Wikia, the money is made by people who are looking at the pages and clicking on the ads. Therefore, you want to encourage people to create a wiki that gets more eyeballs on the page. SWFanon has 100 contributors, so at a 70.3% ratio, that's about 143 readers a month. Dofus has 55 contributors, so at a 3.2% ratio, that's about 1,718 readers a month. Dofus brings in more readers, and therefore more potential click-through. So why does Angela's post imply that SWFanon is at the top of the list of successful wikis, and Dofus is at the bottom? -- Danny On 1/26/07, Laurence Parry wrote: > > > So in other words, Jakob Nielsen has no idea what he's talking about. > I'd > > tell him so, but there doesn't seem to be a way to leave comments on his > > page. The hypocrite. > > Nielson's contact details are right at the bottom of the front page. He's > reachable by email - I've done so myself. > > As for his message . . . for his audience, I think he's pretty much spot > on. > He is writing for specific customers - the people who run websites, often > large, content-based ones. It is typically viewed as advantageous *to the > site owner* to have people contributing as much as possible in as many > ways > as possible. If you can make it so that everyone contributes reviews all > the > time, your site will probably be more attractive to potential users than > another site where only 10% of users write reviews, or they only do so 10% > of the time. More content is assumed to be better, even if it is not all > of > a high quality, just as long as it is on average not of _negative_ quality > such that it that detracts from the site. If you can find a method to > promote good content to the top of the pile, or to take advantage of the > people who do not deliberately contribute and have them make stealth > contributions, that is a bonus, and counteracts some of the negatives (for > example, people not wanting to contribute quality work because they feel > they will be lost in the mass may desire to if they see they have a chance > to be promoted to the top - this would be "Featured articles" on Wikipedia > and elsewhere). > > If you are running a site where, say, personal opinions or personal > knowledge/experiences form a large part of the content, I would say that > it > is generally best to have as many people giving them as possible. This > assumes that everyone's contributions have positive value, or at least > that > the end result of any random assortment of contributors is likely to be > positive. This is highly debatable, but most wikis are setup is to assume > that - and wikis have been quite successful in delivering sites with lots > of > useful information. On highly specific topics where there is specialized > knowledge, it may not be the case; indeed, this has been a concern for > many > Wikipedia articles, and some Wikia sites. At that point, people often try > to > limit or bias contributions towards experts, with varying success. > > It is possible to have really good high-quality sites that have very few > contributors on a well-defined topic. For example, this guy (alone) does > webcam reviews and is very highly rated for them: > http://cowboyfrank.net/webcams/index.htm > However, if the topic is popular enough, they tend to be overcome in the > end > by the sheer mass of content offered by the sites that have those 1001 > reviews (or articles, or whatever). MSN is a popular site in part because, > even though it may not have the utmost experts on any particular topic, it > has a lot of "pretty good" content on a lot of topics. Similarly, Amazon > isn't the place to go for consistently good webcam reviews, but it _does_ > have an awful lot of them, and they usually average out to a good > estimation > of a camera's capabilities. > > Oh, and you do have a responsibility to report in every day. Otherwise, > you're not giving as much to the community as you could be. Stop slacking! > :-) > > --- > Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry > > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > Wikia-l at wikia.com > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/924b3603/attachment.html From greenreaper at hotmail.com Fri Jan 26 16:46:31 2007 From: greenreaper at hotmail.com (Laurence Parry) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com><3b6cf93a0701251410u79209debpb7cee67bed88e8b2@mail.gmail.com><8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com><45B97591.9030805@gmail.com><44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > Dofus brings in more readers, and therefore more potential click-through. > So > why does Angela's post imply that SWFanon is at the top of the list of > successful wikis, and Dofus is at the bottom? One explanation (and I don't know if it's the right one, only Angela could really say) would be because she takes the view that a big part of "success" for Wikia is based on developing communities of contributors rather than on visitors' ad clickthrough. It's a point of view that is not necessarily the right one for business success, but then nor is one based on hit count - or even on the number of articles. It may not be one that is shared by the individual site contributors, many of whom will want their contributons to be read as much as they want other people to contribute to it. Only Wikia knows what the ratio of visitors to ad clickthrough is for each site - without that, we can't know what sites are profitable (or, more likely even at this stage, "less unprofitable"), and even that wouldn't tell us which one is the "better" site. After all, ads have to be more interesting than the content, so in theory a higher ad clickthrough means that the site isn't doing well enough at delivering relevant content to the user. To take a different view on the same issue: I'm sure Wikipedia's pages on the Muppets get a huge number of hits - probably more than Muppet Wiki as a whole, given that they're one of the top Google hits for it. Does it make Wikipedia a better Muppet site? I wouldn't say so - not for all visitors, anyway. It gives a good overview, like furry fandom's articles on Wikipedia, and that may be enough for a lot of visitors. But if you want the details, you go to somewhere like the Muppet Wiki - a site that almost certainly has a larger ratio of contributors to viewers than Wikipedia's Muppet articles. It's a different audience, and that's probably for the best, because having Wikia compete directly with Wikipedia's readers is a losing proposition. (The above might actually mean that ads would be more successful on Wikipedia than on Wikia for any given page. No idea if that's actually true or not, and I doubt Wikipedians are interested in testing. :-) --- Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry From toughpigs at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 18:02:30 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > One explanation (and I don't know if it's the right one, only Angela could > really say) would be because she takes the view that a big part of > "success" > for Wikia is based on developing communities of contributors rather than > on > visitors' ad clickthrough. I agree that you need to build a community of contributors to make a successful wiki. What I'm saying is that once you hit a certain threshold -- let's say, 12 active contributors a month, to choose an arbitrary number -- then you've done that job. Any wiki that gets at least 12 contributors a month is going to be active and self-sustaining. We've got a nice collection of those right now -- Star Wars, Memory Alpha, Wikiality, Furry, Runescape, Dofus, Halo, Muppet Wiki, Transformers, Ewrestling, Zelda, Inheritance. Those are successful sites that are each building on their contributor base, slowly but consistently. For those sites, I don't think it makes sense to imply that they're not doing enough to build their contributor base. Those are the best sites, the most successful and the most popular. Wikia should be looking at what those sites are doing right and adapting from those models, rather than criticizing them for not doing enough. Dofus is in the top ten English language sites on Wikia. They have 55 active contributors, and over 5,000 pages. They make hundreds of edits a day. And on top of that, they attract more than ten times the number of readers that SWfanon does. I think to imply that Dofus isn't doing a good enough job of attracting a productive community of contributors is insulting -- to those hard-working contributors, and to the other wikis that are pulling off similar magical feats. Earlier in this conversation, Scott said that it was nice to know that Muppet Wiki was attracting so many readers. Angela said to Scott: "In some ways it is encouraging, but at the same time, you should think about why they're not involved in the project." To which I have to say: We should do what now? Are you seriously telling us -- not just me and Scott, but also Star Wars, Memory Alpha, Dofus and all the rest -- that we need to "think about" why we're not attracting enough contributors? And you're suggesting that the model we should aspire to is SWfanon, which can't attract any *readers*? As always, I find the Wikia understanding of "community" to be fairly suspect. In my wiki's community, we compliment and encourage our most active contributors. We don't insult them. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/57d329d0/attachment.html From johnq at wikia.com Fri Jan 26 19:01:39 2007 From: johnq at wikia.com (John Q.) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:01:39 -0800 Subject: [Wikia-l] [Fwd: Re: A small sample of Wikia page views] Message-ID: <45BA5013.3070800@wikia.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070126/ca0ca577/attachment.html From jwales at wikia.com Sat Jan 27 09:42:17 2007 From: jwales at wikia.com (Jimmy Wales) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:42:17 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <8b722b800701251413t614c799au89bf4d2b5e3b4f44@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45BB1E79.7090009@wikia.com> Danny Horn wrote: > For those sites, I don't think it makes sense to imply that they're not > doing enough to build their contributor base. Those are the best sites, the > most successful and the most popular. Wikia should be looking at what those > sites are doing right and adapting from those models, rather than > criticizing them for not doing enough. Absolutely! I missed the start of this thread so I am not sure what was said, but I can tell you that I absolutely think that the sites that you listed are fabulous. I often use Muppet Wikia as an example in my public talks as an example of what I really love about good wiki communities... friendly helpful people doing something they love in a spirit of helpfulness. > Earlier in this conversation, Scott said that it was nice to know that > Muppet Wiki was attracting so many readers. Angela said to Scott: "In some > ways it is encouraging, but at the same time, you should think about why > they're not involved in the project." I think everything is fine at Muppet Wikia. I don't think Angela meant this in the way you took it. :) I think it is always good for all of us in good communities to think about some meta-issues... and to understand that the answers will be different for different groups depending on what they are trying to accomplish. I think SWfanon is healthy whether they attract readers or not, as long as they are having fun doing something they love. If their work is primarily _for themselves_, that's great... it is really the nature of the work they are doing. At the same time, I am sure they would like to have more readers, and so it is worth assessing the site to see if they think something not yet noticed is confusing or turning away readers. The same sort of thing for the Muppet site, where clearly, the site is written with loving care for the reader very much in mind. And the number of readers is a measure of that success, and that's fabulous. And at the same time, without raising any criticism at all, any healthy wiki community can ask itself: how can we get more good contributors? In either sort of site, the answer might be "well, there is nothing we want to change, all is well". Or the answer (for SWFanon) might be "hmm, let's make the front page different in such and such a way". Or the answer (for Muppets) might be "Let's modify our meet-and-greet style and see what happens". Or it might be (and is, in my opinion) "all is well". > As always, I find the Wikia understanding of "community" to be fairly > suspect. In my wiki's community, we compliment and encourage our most > active contributors. We don't insult them. I agree with you completely. This is one of the things I explain to people about the Muppets community and why it is so fabulous. --Jimbo From jwales at wikia.com Sat Jan 27 09:48:55 2007 From: jwales at wikia.com (Jimmy Wales) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:48:55 +0100 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45BB2007.2030400@wikia.com> Angela wrote: > We found that exactly 90% of page views were from users who were not > logged in. Some exceptions to 90-10 rule are: > o High: > + Star Wars Fanon with 70.3% registered > + Central Wikia with 38% - 48% registered > + Cybernations with 30.6% registered > o Low: > + Dofus with 3.2% registered > + EVCHK with 3.1% registered > + Smallville with 2.6% registered > + 24 with 1.8% registered > + Spanking Art with 1% registered This is interesting and seems to fall in line with what I would have guessed, with some exceptions. Wikis which are mostly inwardly focused (in the sense that the community writes for the community, rather than on something the general public cares about) should have a higher percentage of contributors. Wikis which are on topics popular with the general public should have a lower percentage. "Spanking Art" is probably a subject which a lot of people would be uncomfortable contributing to, but might be curious to look at. "24" is not a subject that people would be uncomfortable contributing to, but it gets a lot of pageviews from people who are just looking for information. Pretty neat. From toughpigs at gmail.com Sat Jan 27 16:25:50 2007 From: toughpigs at gmail.com (Danny Horn) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: <45BB1E79.7090009@wikia.com> References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <45B97591.9030805@gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> <45BB1E79.7090009@wikia.com> Message-ID: Yeah, I absolutely agree that every Wikia can improve, including Muppet Wiki and all the other active sites. We need to keep building the contributor base, and come up with new ideas for how to get more people involved. And obviously, I appreciate the nice things that you're saying about our site, and I know that that applies to the other active sites too. My real point is that if we want to help Wikia sites to grow, then we need to be looking in the right direction. I think if you look at the main statistics pages, it's easy to see which sites are growing -- and if you compare those sites, it's not hard to draw conclusions about what works and what doesn't. For example, it seems to me that wikis that start with a single founder tend to fail, while wikis that start with a group of two or three friends working together tend to succeed. It's a lot of work getting a wiki started, and it's easy to get discouraged if you're the only person getting it all set up. If you have a group of friends working together, then that gets you through the early days until you can attract new contributors. If my observation on that is true, then that can have an impact on Wikia's structure. You might decide to change the application process -- a new wiki has to have three co-founders to get approved, rather than one. Now, that chain of reasoning starts with paying attention to the successful sites -- not just saying, great, those guys are doing well, but really looking closely at how the sites work, and what they're doing. So I was dismayed yesterday to see that Angela is looking in the wrong direction. If the numbers seem to show that SWfanon is doing a better job than Dofus, then those numbers aren't helpful -- and Angela isn't paying attention to what's actually happening on the Wikia sites. I'm concerned that that Jakob Nielsen article is also pointing people in the wrong direction. The whole concept of "participation inequality" is seriously flawed, and I would question any conclusions that are drawn from that premise. Essentially, "inequality" means that something isn't fair. Nielsen says: "Obviously, if you want to assess the 'feelings of the community' it's highly unfair if one subgroup's 19,000 members have the same representation as another subgroup's 580,000 members." Now, what does it mean that that's "unfair"? Who exactly is responsible for this unfair situation? It can't be the site owners -- Wikipedia or Amazon or whoever. They've set up a system that allows everybody to participate equally. So there's two other parties who might make this "unfair" -- the 1% of users who participate all the time, and the 90% of "lurkers" who don't participate at all. Nielsen definitely has unflattering things to say about the most active 1%. He says that "it can seem as if they don't have lives". He says that "people who post only when they have something important to say will be drowned out by the torrent of material from the hyperactive 1%." He warns, "Don't give too much to the most active participants, or you'll simply encourage them to dominate the system even more." That attitude has definite implications for Wikia, because your hyperactive, over-dominating participants with no lives... are the people who create and manage the wikis. Me, and the other wiki founders -- we're your 1%. Then there's the 90% majority, who are also responsible for the "inequality". They're getting a free ride, "lurking" on your sites. They're not giving you the feedback that you need, they're not standing up to represent themselves, and they're screwing up the search engines by not writing enough blog posts. Essentially, they're parasites, taking advantage of other people's contributions without adding anything themselves. I know that Nielsen's point is that the site design should change to make it easier for people to participate, and I agree with that on the most basic level. However, I'm suspicious of any recommendations that start with the premise that your most active participants are hyperactive losers, and the majority of your readers are free-riding parasites. Nielsen doesn't have a single nice thing to say about either contributors or readers. He shows no interest in seeing things from the customer's point of view. So I don't like the idea that Wikia is being influenced by that line of thinking. If you want to know how to make Wikia better, don't listen to the guy who devalues your contributors and your readers. Watch what's happening on the successful sites, and draw your conclusions from there. -- Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.wikia.com/pipermail/wikia-l/attachments/20070127/be49175d/attachment.html From twotailedfox at gmail.com Sat Jan 27 16:45:43 2007 From: twotailedfox at gmail.com (TwoTailedFox) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:45:43 +0000 Subject: [Wikia-l] A small sample of Wikia page views In-Reply-To: References: <8b722b800701251403ie4bfefq1df94fb35a8c4f1f@mail.gmail.com> <44b952b0701251945r76bf4b81kc3eef06f4b4051db@mail.gmail.com> <45BB1E79.7090009@wikia.com> Message-ID: